Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

The problem of Openspace is problem of the business model of Linden.

Rado Arado
Registered User
Join date: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 3
11-02-2008 09:56
This say is my friend Uota Noel In-Would.

It is not viewpoint as a user, we have decided to try considering from point of view as a business.
As for the business of present Linden that those which were done originally with good intention it probably will develop largely as business the impression which is in the crisis which fails is I.

Balance of the load of the traffic which manage depends on Lineden and utilization profit does not agree because?
The air which has become the problem you make the source of reduction and earnings of load somewhere, does problem.

Deducing best method it probably is ability as a manager?

To that in the range which owns Prim in regard to application call freedom to the last. The person who thinks of the board always exists. It is fate of the capitalism which pursues efficiency.
When what the merit is pursued in the range of the limit of rule is common sense we should recognize, when. This is outline.

Method of using Prim for view improving (method of making the facility) standard other than depending on the standard of good intention and the individual not to be clear, as a rule, it is not.

Vis-a-vis this, the correspondence of current Linden is thorough this rule strictly, fragility it can the mechanism.

With just rule such as rental prohibition it is the expectation which is not cancelled. As for the board is many.

If the number of Prim uses is lowered to the extremity, it can turn to just the sea, but you probably can call the view where that is beautiful? This dilemma can be cancelled as for me does not think in the latest announcement.

That finally increase of the user it does not become the deciding factor which makes beautifully good view, I think.

The quantities of Prim whole being few temporarily, just inserted 1 scripts whose load is high in 1Prim load is the same thing as a result. Lovely there are also times when 1 dogs has an influence on the load of the whole SIM.

Whether this in the general user some load is imposed, it is not easy to understand. Not only drawing load problem of a state where it is seen, the [te], how explaining script load, whether it regulates becaes because it is not clear. Attaching the hair and the bag and the kind of belt which also number 100Prim are, you walk and at all load of the thing which it turns has not been shown either rule.

As for the user as for that kind of thing without knowing, Second Life is enjoyed. There is also a possibility of applying the load which is much higher than the building which it is fixed.
The ??? wax which it can expect that also the load which searches the baggage which becomes also several tens of thousands is very high.

That it does not become the decisive solution where replacement of the server who this time is examined lightens load I think.
As for the latest announcement essential solution, or nothing system restriction which decreases traffic is shown.

After all, because without the person coming there is only a method of should make Openspace which sufficient, what which is seen is not, marking up, what, the kind of air which it means does not have.
That is not Openspace original use method and the like, only it probably is the short circuit method of increasing the profit simply. However with Linden the mechanism which can be utilized cheaply with previous rate revision was made, as the result you feel that judgment was done, that without being able to obtain the enlargement of the earnings which it corresponds to user increase, only load became became high.

A rumor that you have heard effective use step of the old server appeared in the reverse side. As for this without being the strategic mistake for Openspace of the linden tree? We would like to increase the user, but we would like to load and lighten not be able to offer the value which you use vis-a-vis the ideal that, as business, just the individual that increases you do not focus cost and would like to play. Without being able to make the business model where you can obtain the profit from the individual who increases with no charge utilization, the air which has kept becoming a state where even creativity of the entry person it cannot utilize does as for me.

The fact that the Second Life leaving of enterprise is advanced to unhappy thing and it is actuality, (the Japanese enterprise) the method of obtaining directly, the profit from enterprise indirectly have become unable to be visible. I as a business feel the symptom of failure even here. Not only short circuit profit acquisition and we would like to have thinking of the strategy which is connected to long-term development.

As for the air which denies Linden unilaterally there is no I, but while guaranteeing the profit, unless you think of the business model which maintains the satisfaction of the user sooner or later failure of business can't help it does not escape because with, beith, be able to think. With special care you call imagination, because the platform which so far is not was made, gathering intelligence, that we would like to have thinking of the development, it keeps asking. In such sense as for me we would like to support Linden, is.

As description below you probably can'tthink the choices?

 It develops Viewer which can be played low even with efficiency PC, (excessive function you are lazy).
 All the usage of SL itself is made the origin simple, (is difficult use fee is taken abnormally even somewhat from) participant everyone, (100 Yen A? 5,000,000 people = 500,000,000 Yen).
 [tekisuchiya] ?? system restriction of size and the like is done, (upload fee is same with any texture).
 Utilization restriction of the script where load is imposed is applied system, (script load is not acknowledged in the general user).
 Installation it restricts the thing Prim.

As for the obstacle which cannot increase the customer simply " weight " just is not because and, rule is not protected, it probably is not the case that traffic increases.
Not only contract item and [sore], that it should do system correspondence, I think. The management which does not obstruct the creativity of the participant is desired.
Increasing price, if it faces to the business which it retrogresses to the times that e.g., you will improve the profit, in the future of Linden, whether just a little it is dark.
Somehow changing the head, we would like to have endeavoring. The customer increasing, traffic decreasing, upload earnings and server rent increase, if is, at all there is no problem, however probably will be, the air may become as it is now the opposite, does as for me.


Commenting of the latest price hike compared to that in the future of the linden tree the shadow points fear should be done.
Spacexcape Bridges
pissed off
Join date: 26 Jun 2008
Posts: 104
ok so here is my point as a business person
11-02-2008 12:54
I buy three sims in July - two are Open Spaces. Before purchasing, I ask Linden about the tenants on the Open Sims and they give me 'advice' on that. They did not once mention that those lands were being overused or that they should not be used for residential. Content that I can continue renting them on the same basis as the outgoing owner and the plan being that any revenue from those islands would help to finance the Spacexcape Project. 16 weeks later, I am told that the rent os to increase by over 70% (VAT being charged to me also.) Thus the Open Sims are not being abandoned and my project is in jeopardy.

I have never abused the original agreement. Light usage - low traffic - no heavy scripts. Just two nice sims with a few people enjoying their lives there.

I hope Linden Labs suffers as much as the people they hurt do now.
_____________________
Spacexcape Bridges
_________________
Project Co-ordinator for the Spacexcape Project
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Spacexcape/15/162/22
http://spacexcape.com
Rado Arado
Registered User
Join date: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 3
My friends have borrowed the Openspace
11-05-2008 09:45
Total is the owner of your SIM, Openspace of my friends use it, is that the user is borrowed.
He also the location of the low and very low traffic volume has operated in the script. 3 people living there are more that the increase in life-Linden, would in fact kicked out from the SIM will be. Openspace it to the original owner of SIM is expected to have an effect. Who was kicked out of places to visit again and I think a little.

The action to increase, as a result of SIM and the results will drive out the residents. It will answer as a metaverse? It should be different. Accept a lower performance, and was clearly in control of even one device will be cleared by.
Erluen Twin
Registered User
Join date: 26 May 2006
Posts: 23
Japanese Translation by babelfish
11-05-2008 22:26
合計はあなたのSIMの所有者、私の友人の使用のOpenspaceそれ、ユーザーが借りられることであるである。また彼は原稿で低速および非常に低い交通量の位置作動した。 そこに住んでいる3人は生命シナノキの増加が、SIMから蹴られて実際はある多くである。 Openspace SIMの元の所有者への効果をもたらすことを期待する。 だれが場所から再度訪問するためにおよび蹴られたか私はやや考える。

SIMおよび結果の結果として、増加するべき行為は居住者を追い払う。 それはmetaverseとして答えるか。 それは異なるべきである。より低い性能を受け入れ、1つの装置を管理してはっきり取り除かれるあった。


I dont understand what you say. Sorry.