Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

LL and the English Language

Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
11-04-2009 03:04
Just something to give you a midweek smile :)

http://www.slapt.me/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=1123
_____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.

http://slapt.me



slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26
Deira Llanfair
Deira to rhyme with Myra
Join date: 16 Oct 2006
Posts: 2,315
11-04-2009 03:14
Oh dear me! The perils of automated keyword checking! I suppose she had better change "converse" to "speak to".
_____________________
Deira :)
Must create animations for head-desk and palm-face!.
Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
11-04-2009 03:17
LOL the funny thing is that there are many pages showing with the word converse in them as in "speak to" but LL made a point of deleting Consies products. I just wish they worked harder on getting things right first before taking action ;)
_____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.

http://slapt.me



slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26
Rock Vacirca
riches to rags
Join date: 18 Oct 2006
Posts: 1,093
11-04-2009 03:27
From: Deira Llanfair
Oh dear me! The perils of automated keyword checking! I suppose she had better change "converse" to "speak to".


There are tens of thousands of brand names and company names that are single words, and that are in common verbal useage (gap, tide, aspire, accord, puma, vista, sprint, etc etc).

Do LL have a list of them all? Or only the US brands? Or only those who have paid them something to get on a watch-list?

I didn't think LL could get any lower in my estimation, but now they are tunneling underground.

Rock
Sling Trebuchet
Deleted User
Join date: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 4,548
11-04-2009 04:15
The converse of 'all Converse are shoes' is (nearly) 'some converse are Converse'.
_____________________
Maggie: We give our residents a lot of tools, to build, create, and manage their lands and objects. That flexibility also requires people to exercise judgment about when things should be used.
http://www.ace-exchange.com/home/story/BDVR/589
Innula Zenovka
Registered User
Join date: 20 Jun 2007
Posts: 1,825
11-04-2009 04:24
Take a look at http://tinyurl.com/ykyemz8

I hope Bill Gates' lawyers don't get to hear about it, is all I can say...
Phil Deakins
Prim Savers = low prims
Join date: 17 Jan 2007
Posts: 9,537
11-04-2009 04:42
From: Rock Vacirca
There are tens of thousands of brand names and company names that are single words, and that are in common verbal useage (gap, tide, aspire, accord, puma, vista, sprint, etc etc).

Do LL have a list of them all? Or only the US brands? Or only those who have paid them something to get on a watch-list?

I didn't think LL could get any lower in my estimation, but now they are tunneling underground.

Rock
Totally agreed. The depths of LL's stupidities know no limit.
_____________________
Prim Savers - almost 1000 items of superbly crafted, top quality, very low prim furniture, and all at amazingly low prices.

http://slurl.com/secondlife/Seymour/213/120/251/
Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
11-04-2009 08:38
From: Phil Deakins
Totally agreed. The depths of LL's stupidities know no limit.


Some of the staff need bashing with the Clue stick ;)
_____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.

http://slapt.me



slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26
Veritable Quandry
Meddling kid.
Join date: 23 May 2008
Posts: 519
11-04-2009 09:01
From: Lord Sullivan
Some of the staff need bashing with the Clue stick ;)


Um...Hasbro's on the phone, would like to have a word with you...
Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
11-04-2009 09:48
From: Veritable Quandry
Um...Hasbro's on the phone, would like to have a word with you...


Order a box and have it shipped direct ;)
_____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.

http://slapt.me



slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26
RockAndRoll Michigan
Registered User
Join date: 23 Mar 2009
Posts: 589
11-04-2009 12:15
I'm afraid I didn't get a smile of any kind out of this thread. All I can do is shake my head at the complete stupidity of Linden Lab and how far out of touch they are with reality. What's next, an official statement from Linden Lab that the entire British royal family is shape-shifting lizards?
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
11-04-2009 12:18
From: RockAndRoll Michigan
I'm afraid I didn't get a smile of any kind out of this thread. All I can do is shake my head at the complete stupidity of Linden Lab and how far out of touch they are with reality. What's next, an official statement from Linden Lab that the entire British royal family is shape-shifting lizards?


If you watched "V" last night, it may be just that.
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
RockAndRoll Michigan
Registered User
Join date: 23 Mar 2009
Posts: 589
11-04-2009 12:21
From: Brenda Connolly
If you watched "V" last night, it may be just that.


I didn't bother. I saw it in the 80's. Just another network TV rehash because they're too lazy to write anything new.
Indeterminate Schism
Registered User
Join date: 24 May 2008
Posts: 236
11-05-2009 00:43
Lol, and of an Xstreet search for 'Nike' (goddess of victory) returns this bunch
https://xstreetsl.com/modules.php?name=Marketplace&SearchKeyword=nike&SearchLocale=0&
SearchPriceMin=&SearchPriceMax=&SearchRatingMin=&SearchRatingMax=&searchSubmitImage_x=0&
searchSubmitImage_y=0&&columns=3


Do you think they have ANY chance at all of removing th right ones?
Seriously, the failure to take any sensible or decisive action on their own policies is a major reason I'm fed-up with LL. It would not be hard or too labour-intensive to scan the listings for the common words like this and bring-them to the attention of a human being, if LL have any. Even better would be submissions-review, but either way they have to just start behaving better towards their customers.

In the meantime I'm over to dig up some COKE to FUEL my STEAM PUMA so it can SPRINT to the TIDE line as it ASPIREs to enjoy the VISTA and I am in ACCORD. IT used to use DIESEL but COKE filles the same GAP.

Who? Me? What keyword spamming?
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
11-05-2009 00:49
From: RockAndRoll Michigan
I didn't bother. I saw it in the 80's. Just another network TV rehash because they're too lazy to write anything new.
But . . . but . . . but . . . you don't understand . . .

Pep ( . . . this is the documentary version.)
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
Qie Niangao
Coin-operated
Join date: 24 May 2006
Posts: 7,138
11-05-2009 03:30
Heh. Besides "Windows™", I can't wait 'till the Nebraska folks get nastygrams for every use of the word "Office".

Or the word "Word", for that matter. :rolleyes:
_____________________
Archived for Your Protection
Brenda Connolly
Un United Avatar
Join date: 10 Jan 2007
Posts: 25,000
11-05-2009 06:32
From: Pserendipity Daniels
But . . . but . . . but . . . you don't understand . . .

Pep ( . . . this is the documentary version.)


If you are a follower of David Icke, it may be just that.
_____________________
Don't you ever try to look behind my eyes. You don't want to know what they have seen.

http://brenda-connolly.blogspot.com
Jig Chippewa
Fine Young Cannibal
Join date: 30 Oct 2006
Posts: 5,150
11-05-2009 06:39
From: RockAndRoll Michigan
I didn't bother. I saw it in the 80's. Just another network TV rehash because they're too lazy to write anything new.


Some of us were twinkles in our mum's eye. And the 80s were ghastly fashion, big hair that wibbled, strange music that sounds stranger today, cars that lacked any style whatoever, and odd politics.

So maybe this V is better. Anyway, what's wrong with a bit of devotion to a lizard, that'swhat I say. Particularly, if they have plenty of the H1N1 vaccine.
_____________________
Fine Young Cannibal
Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
11-06-2009 00:50
Thread has been updated :)
_____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.

http://slapt.me



slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26
Francesca Alva
Registered Trademark
Join date: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 507
11-06-2009 01:18
/me Snickers at LL™'s ineptitude. It's something like this that Mars one's day. I can think of a whole Galaxy of words that should not be included (and some of them may even be non-chocolate related).

If only they could stand back from the mess and take a Bird's Eye view of their policy, they'd realize what a Horlicks they're making of things.

I suppose it's a sign of The Times, and LL™ feels they have to be the Guardian of RL™ trademarks. SL™ Daily Mirrors problems in RL™. One thing's for sure - since the Lab took over XStreet it's no longer Quality Street.

Francesca Alva™ :p
Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
11-06-2009 01:24
From: Francesca Alva
/me Snickers at LL™'s ineptitude. It's something like this that Mars one's day. I can think of a whole Galaxy of words that should not be included (and some of them may even be non-chocolate related).

If only they could stand back from the mess and take a Bird's Eye view of their policy, they'd realize what a Horlicks they're making of things.

I suppose it's a sign of The Times, and LL™ feels they have to be the Guardian of RL™ trademarks. SL™ Daily Mirrors problems in RL™. One thing's for sure - since the Lab took over XStreet it's no longer Quality Street.

Francesca Alva™ :p


:) :) Stupity at its finest down at the Lab :) :)
_____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.

http://slapt.me



slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26
Lear Cale
wordy bugger
Join date: 22 Aug 2007
Posts: 3,569
11-06-2009 05:44
There are really two failures here.

One is a failure of diligence on the part of an LL employee. Some idiot just responded with a form letter rather than doing their job and paying attention to the email. Perhaps they were too busy playing SL to do their job correctly.

The other is a failure of policy. LL should carefully vet their list of trademarks and put those that are valid words in some language into a second list, requiring an employee to ACTUALLY LOOK AT THE AD to make a judgement whether the use of the term is a trademark violation.

Failure to do this is serious incompetence.

Now, I'm one who usually defends LL against claims of incompetence. They create and manage an amazingly complicated product, and have to make very difficult policy judgements. Even the very best policies look foolish from some angle. Plus they have to deal with real-world forces such as laws and marketing issues.

But they have no excuse in this case, UNLESS they say that they DO have such a policy, but that some employee was lax in following it and will be reprimanded. (Yeah, good luck with that one.)

The only appropriate response for them would be to fix their policy and offer an apology.

It's trivial to find the trademarks that are not English words: just feed them all into the UNIX "spell" program -- the ones that get echoed are not English words. (Might be a bit more difficult for other languages, unless UNIX has variants of this program for them.)

For those that are English words, and to reduce the need for human monitoring, they could, for each trademark, have a list of keywords one of which must also appear for the item to get flagged for human review. For example, for Converse, "shoes" and "sneakers" would be appropriate. This would avoid a lot of false positives, with relatively few false negatives. We can let the trademark owners worry about those that slip through! (As that's how it's done in RL, anyway.)
Lord Sullivan
DTC at all times :)
Join date: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 2,870
11-06-2009 14:22
From: Lear Cale
There are really two failures here.

One is a failure of diligence on the part of an LL employee. Some idiot just responded with a form letter rather than doing their job and paying attention to the email. Perhaps they were too busy playing SL to do their job correctly.

The other is a failure of policy. LL should carefully vet their list of trademarks and put those that are valid words in some language into a second list, requiring an employee to ACTUALLY LOOK AT THE AD to make a judgement whether the use of the term is a trademark violation.

Failure to do this is serious incompetence.

Now, I'm one who usually defends LL against claims of incompetence. They create and manage an amazingly complicated product, and have to make very difficult policy judgements. Even the very best policies look foolish from some angle. Plus they have to deal with real-world forces such as laws and marketing issues.

But they have no excuse in this case, UNLESS they say that they DO have such a policy, but that some employee was lax in following it and will be reprimanded. (Yeah, good luck with that one.)

The only appropriate response for them would be to fix their policy and offer an apology.

It's trivial to find the trademarks that are not English words: just feed them all into the UNIX "spell" program -- the ones that get echoed are not English words. (Might be a bit more difficult for other languages, unless UNIX has variants of this program for them.)

For those that are English words, and to reduce the need for human monitoring, they could, for each trademark, have a list of keywords one of which must also appear for the item to get flagged for human review. For example, for Converse, "shoes" and "sneakers" would be appropriate. This would avoid a lot of false positives, with relatively few false negatives. We can let the trademark owners worry about those that slip through! (As that's how it's done in RL, anyway.)


I do hope that they do something after this situation and the suggestions that you make are an excellent way forward. As far as an apology is concerned, well if they do we will post it in the thread on slapt.me but I for one will not hold my breath. LL are aware of this thread and the one on slapt so I hope that they read and take note but again please do not hold your breath ;)

The funny thing is that converse labeled products are still to be seen on Xstreet so go figure :)
_____________________
Independent Shopping for Second Life residents from established and new merchants.

http://slapt.me



slapt.me - In-World HQ http://slurl.com/secondlife/Bastet/123/118/26