An Inventory Idea: What Are Your Thoughts?
|
|
Infrared Wind
Gridologist
Join date: 7 Jan 2007
Posts: 662
|
12-04-2008 05:56
Inventory Idea
[Before I start: boxing things up might achieve the same cost reduction as what I'm suggesting below.]
Linden Lab sets up an offline storage database, let's call it "The Shed".
Users can store stuff there, so that it will be offline and not in their working, "live" Inventory.
They can copy it back to the active Inventory if they need it, or store it in the "storage shed".
How does it work:
1. On the Inventory dialog, there will be a tab that's titled "The Shed" (or whatever). Clicking on that opens a new dialog that looks just like the Inventory. So this step is just like opening two Inventory windows.
2. Once the two windows are open one can drop TO the Shed Inventory or FROM the Shed Inventory, from the active Inventory.
And that's it.
Why?
Well if one has > 10,000 items or so, something as frequent as crossing a SIM will have an extra cost according to the size of the Inventory. At least this is my understanding of how "passing off" SIM-to-SIM works.
If people are like me, they only need a small part of their Inventory to "operate". Probably 90% of people's Inventory is just stored "precious" stuff.
Such a storage strategy in content management could help with the laggage.
Here's a simpler model: right click on the Inventory item, and there would be a choice titled: Offline.
Something like that.
What do you think?
- Infrared
|
|
Czari Zenovka
I've Had it With "PC"!
Join date: 3 May 2007
Posts: 3,688
|
12-04-2008 05:59
If that idea would be more secure than storing excess items in world in a storage trunk, I'd go for it.
_____________________
*Czari's Attic* ~ Relive the fun of exploring an attic for hidden treasures!
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Rakhiot/82/99/111
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.- George Orwell
|
|
Pserendipity Daniels
Assume sarcasm as default
Join date: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 8,839
|
12-04-2008 06:04
They were looking for suggestions for added benefits to offer Premium users. This would seem appropriate.
Pep (Post it in *that* thread maybe?)
_____________________
Hypocrite lecteur, — mon semblable, — mon frère!
|
|
Amaranthim Talon
Voyager, Seeker, Curious
Join date: 14 Nov 2006
Posts: 12,032
|
12-04-2008 06:28
Considering there is a notice proclaiming they have just "found" inventory- do you really want to add additional risk to stuff you lose anyway? Just 'cause it's 'broke' doesn't mean we can count on it being fixed 
_____________________
"Yield to temptation. It may not pass your way again. " Robert A. Heinlein  http://talonfaire.blogspot.com/ Visit Talon Faire Main: http://slurl.com/secondlife/Misto%20Presto/216/21/155- Main Store XStreets: http://tinyurl.com/6r7ayn
|
|
Oryx Tempel
Registered User
Join date: 8 Nov 2006
Posts: 7,663
|
12-04-2008 06:31
I don't see how this would work... the stuff in your Shed would still have to link back to you using the UUID. As far as I know, sim crossings don't involve carrying the Inventory; they involve carrying the links.
|
|
Gabriele Graves
Always and Forever, FULL
Join date: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 6,205
|
12-04-2008 13:59
I must admit to not being keen on this idea, there is just too much to go wrong in an already delicate part of SL. I say leave it be until we can have true offline backup/restore functionality.
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
12-04-2008 14:13
From: Infrared Wind Well if one has > 10,000 items or so, something as frequent as crossing a SIM will have an extra cost according to the size of the Inventory. At least this is my understanding of how "passing off" SIM-to-SIM works. That's the first time I've heard that the size of your inventory had an impact on sim crossing time. Where did you get that?
|
|
Qie Niangao
Coin-operated
Join date: 24 May 2006
Posts: 7,138
|
12-04-2008 15:32
From: Argent Stonecutter That's the first time I've heard that the size of your inventory had an impact on sim crossing time. Where did you get that? I've *heard* it, but never quite understood why it should be true, if it is. I mean, taking Infrared's suggestion one step further: why not just keep all our inventory in the Shed? If that's not how it works now, why ever not?
_____________________
Archived for Your Protection
|
|
Zuleika Deere
Registered User
Join date: 8 Oct 2006
Posts: 77
|
12-04-2008 16:18
If I were LL I would not do it. It would make it even easier for us to collect loads of things, keep doubles etc. That would most certainly mean more and more database storage space needed. Most of use would certainly use the option to collect to our hearts content We would have even more stuff to go through to find something. Imagine the time it would take to open your shed, put on your scuba gear, take your torch and fasten your safety line, and then carefully descend in the unknown depths of your inventory items there. Many of us would surely have a decompression time before even finding the wanted item. Boxing the items you want to keep but don't need directly available all the time is surely much better. I don't think inventory size can have any impact on sim crossing. What I do is log in into my private sandbox, and then make my inventory load by typing something in search. Then I'll do something else (making coffee or so) until my inventory is loaded
|
|
Clarissa Lowell
Gone. G'bye.
Join date: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 3,020
|
12-05-2008 01:04
No, I've had items mysteriously vaporise as it is, let alone having it stored somewhere else and have to keep calling for it.
Just box things you don't use often.
Sort the rest.
|
|
Elanthius Flagstaff
Registered User
Join date: 30 Apr 2006
Posts: 1,534
|
12-05-2008 01:36
This is silly. For a start I really doubt there's some benefit to storing inventory in two different places. If there is some benefit it should be easy for them to archive objects that haven't been accessed for a certain amount of time and then retrieve them from storage and place them back in regular inventory if they are accessed.
This would mean that things you access very rarely would be slower to load but things you access regularly would be in top storage.
There's no need for the user to get involved or have any idea that it's going on.
_____________________
Visit http://ninjaland.net for mainland and covenant rentals or visit our amazing land store at Steamboat (199, 56). Also, we pay L$0.15/sqm/week for tier donated to our group and we rent pure tier to your group for L$0.25/sqm/week. Free L$ for Everyone - http://ninjaland.net/tools/search-scumming/
|
|
Lindal Kidd
Dances With Noobs
Join date: 26 Jun 2007
Posts: 8,371
|
12-05-2008 09:04
From: Oryx Tempel I don't see how this would work... the stuff in your Shed would still have to link back to you using the UUID. As far as I know, sim crossings don't involve carrying the Inventory; they involve carrying the links. Yes...but maybe you could carry just ONE link...between you and your particular Shed?
_____________________
It's still My World and My Imagination! So there. Lindal Kidd
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
12-05-2008 09:27
From: Lindal Kidd Yes...but maybe you could carry just ONE link...between you and your particular Shed? I really don't think sim crossings care about anything in your inventory if it's not actually attached to you at the time.
|