I was bugged taking snapshots with only 11L, now I have -19 Linden
|
|
Brendan Cale
Registered User
Join date: 7 Aug 2007
Posts: 132
|
10-16-2007 21:13
The worst part is too, that I never even got those snapshots, what happened was I was taking snapshots for my profile, the first one didn't go through so I tried it 2 other times, I relog and I have a negative balance now! Fixes before features. (Please don't give me any money to fix it, thanks for that!  ) |
|
Jannae Karas
Just Looking
Join date: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 1,516
|
10-16-2007 21:17
From: Brendan Cale The worst part is too, that I never even got those snapshots, what happened was I was taking snapshots for my profile, the first one didn't go through so I tried it 2 other times, I relog and I have a negative balance now!
Fixes before features. I will pay you 20 to get you back up to + . Excepy I can't find you in search 
_____________________
Taller Than
I Imagined,
nicer than yesterday.
|
|
Jannae Karas
Just Looking
Join date: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 1,516
|
10-16-2007 21:18
Found you.
_____________________
Taller Than
I Imagined,
nicer than yesterday.
|
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
10-16-2007 21:22
I wonder how much sense it makes to charge people for snapshots -
When they turn right around and sell Lindens on the LindenX through Supply Linden.
Youd think if they removed the charge it would just streamline the whole process.
|
|
Brendan Cale
Registered User
Join date: 7 Aug 2007
Posts: 132
|
10-16-2007 21:23
Thanks for helping me, but besides doing that, is there another way to fix it?
Yes, it doesn't make sense to charge for snapshots, Uploads maybe, but not snapshots.
|
|
Colette Meiji
Registered User
Join date: 25 Mar 2005
Posts: 15,556
|
10-16-2007 21:25
From: Brendan Cale Thanks for helping me, but besides doing that, is there another way to fix it?
Yes, it doesn't make sense to charge for snapshots, Uploads maybe, but not snapshots. I do not know. Ive never had negative Lindens though. Ive had a negative main account balance, but luckily always had Lindens to sell to get me back in the clear. |
|
Jannae Karas
Just Looking
Join date: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 1,516
|
10-16-2007 21:27
From: Brendan Cale Thanks for helping me, but besides doing that, is there another way to fix it?
Yes, it doesn't make sense to charge for snapshots, Uploads maybe, but not snapshots. Don't know. i save snapshots to disc at no charge and upload for 10L$. At least that's how it worked yesterday. Also: You are most welcome. I have lost some very expensive items in the past due to SL glitches. I can relate.
_____________________
Taller Than
I Imagined,
nicer than yesterday.
|
|
Void Singer
Int vSelf = Sing(void);
Join date: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 6,973
|
10-17-2007 01:28
personally I think it's just a leftover economic money sink... get some of that cash back from stipends and whatnot.... plus the concept of privelge to use their asset server..
... personally all my snaphots go to disk, high resolution for editing... normal for "captured moments"... I dun trust the assest server enough to keep them in my inventory, upload em back if I really have a use for them... mostly they get archived or shown on my web page anyways
|
|
Johan Laurasia
Fully Rezzed
Join date: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 1,394
|
10-17-2007 02:26
The reason the charge is in place is to prevent an overload of useless garbage being uploaded, or images being stored only with no intention of ever being used in SL. People would use it as a free storage bin for photos from birthday parties and family vacations. Think about it, if uploading was free, it would represent a completely private and free storage bin for images. Don't expect to see the charge go away, it wont.
Besides, what's not streamlined about it, when you upload an image, it's stored, and the 10L is automatically deducted from your account. What's not streamlined?
|