Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Research on gesture transfers and trends

Kidd Krasner
Registered User
Join date: 1 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,938
07-08-2009 10:07
No, not another survey, but a research report on the spread and adoption of gestures in SL. For lack of a better word, I think it's really about how fads spread (though they don't use that term). Gestures were chosen because they're easy to track, not because there's anything special about them. They looked at over 100K gestures (and over 100K users, though I'm not sure how they calculated that).

The press release from the University of Michigan is at http://www.ns.umich.edu/htdocs/releases/story.php?id=7222. Follow the links to find the full report, which is a ten page PDF file (which I haven't read yet).
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
07-08-2009 10:18
From: Kidd Krasner
No, not another survey, but a research report on the spread and adoption of gestures in SL. For lack of a better word, I think it's really about how fads spread (though they don't use that term). Gestures were chosen because they're easy to track, not because there's anything special about them. They looked at over 100K gestures (and over 100K users, though I'm not sure how they calculated that).
They got the data from Linden Labs with identifying names removed.
_____________________
Argent Stonecutter - http://globalcausalityviolation.blogspot.com/

"And now I'm going to show you something really cool."

Skyhook Station - http://xrl.us/skyhook23
Coonspiracy Store - http://xrl.us/coonstore
Kidd Krasner
Registered User
Join date: 1 Jan 2007
Posts: 1,938
07-08-2009 11:03
From: Argent Stonecutter
They got the data from Linden Labs with identifying names removed.

Yes, but my question is whether they were counting distinct avatars or distinct users.
Ponsonby Low
Unregistered User
Join date: 21 May 2008
Posts: 1,893
07-08-2009 12:25
From: Argent Stonecutter
They got the data from Linden Labs with identifying names removed.


That's the most fascinating part of this to me (though the contrast between Early Adopters and Influencers is quite interesting, too).

I didn't know LL was willing to do such a thing.
Amity Slade
Registered User
Join date: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 2,183
07-08-2009 12:50
From: Kidd Krasner
Yes, but my question is whether they were counting distinct avatars or distinct users.


If Linden Lab doesn't have a way of identifying distinct users among avatars, then researchers relying upon that information cannot do so.

The paper does include the methodology, and if you look at the criteria used to select the avatars the researchers tracked, that might answer your underlying questions. Since they used avatars with a demonstrated high degree of social activity, they probably didn't include a lot of bots, dead accounts, and seldom-used alts.