|
Jethro Stubbs
Mainlander
Join date: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 240
|
01-10-2008 08:55
Is there any disavantage in granting a non-officer/owner (but a higher role than Everyone) rights to buy and deed land for the group (but not give them rights to share the proceeds of a sale), assuming the groups land tier can handle more land?
It seems like it would be advantagious for a group to allow members to buy/deed land to the group. Even if the land isn't useful to the group, it could be sold to fund useful group land aquisitions.
All this is assuming that the owners/officers are interested in the group's growth and stability, and not a land scam.
|
|
Qie Niangao
Coin-operated
Join date: 24 May 2006
Posts: 7,138
|
01-10-2008 09:13
Not sure if it's the only risk, but one that I can see is just difficulty in coordinating which land should be held by the group using any donated tier. Say the group is sitting on some unused tier, and somebody deeds land to the group without also donating more tier to cover it: It will use up that pre-existing tier--which the Owners may have had plans to use for some other land.
|
|
Okiphia Anatine
Okiphia Rayna
Join date: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 454
|
01-10-2008 09:15
In my Family group, I allow everyone to buy and deed land to the group. Only thing is, if something is donated, and the tier isnt there somehow, I'll remove the land from the group.
Only I can join parcels, so it's easy to distinguish.
_____________________
In-world, I am Okiphia Rayna. This account is an alt, and is the only account I currently have with payment info on-file due to some account cracking that took place. This is a security measure at present, and I may return to the forums as Okiphia Rayna at a later date.
If you need to reach me, IM Okiphia Rayna, not Okiphia Anatine
|