Well, If I take your question literally, I'd say it's entirely possible. After all, you do seem to have a "different understanding" of certain words already, judging by your writing here. For example, most people "understand" the word "ore" to mean unrefined metal, but not you. And most people "understand" that the words "is" and "has" each have their own separate definitions and usages, but you seem to feel they're interchangeable since you wrote "this is become" instead of "this has become". You also seem to have a completely unique "understanding" of how many periods go at the end of a sentence. Most people "understand" that one is sufficient, but you seem to feel that anywhere from three to seven are necessary. And most people "understand" that sentences start with capital letters, but you don't seem to want to fall in line with that either.
So yes, it's possible your "understanding" of the word "resolved" is out there as well.
Now that I've said that, let's talk about what you actually meant, not just how you said it.
As Colette mentioned, the Lindens do seem to have an unfortunate habit of applying the word "resolved" prematurely. It would be nice if they'd use something intermediary like "alleviated" or "mitigated" until they're absolutely certain the problem is actually fixed.
But in all fairness, sometimes there are cascade failures that they can't know are going to happen. When a problem has more than one cause, it can very well seem like its fixed for a little while, even when it's not. Networks are temperamental things. Sometimes when one part of a network fails, it sets a chain of events in motion, the results of which can manifest themselves hours or days later, well after the cause of the initial failure was repaired. In cases like that, a "resolved" stamp might indeed seem warranted at the time, since no one has any way of knowing that there's still a silent chain reaction in progress, brewing either a new set of problems or a return of the previous one.
In cases like that, it often seems to us on the user side that the original problem wasn't actually ever fixed, especially if the new one has similar symptoms. But the truth is even though the second instance might have the same symptoms as the first, the actual cause is completely different. The first simply helped trigger the second, but other than that, they're unrelated.
That, of course, doesn't make it any less annoying for us. But I think it's worth keeping in mind that the Lindens are just as annoyed. They don't want it not to work any more than we do. I get as frustrated as anyone else, but I do try to remember that the good human beings over at Linden Lab are always working very hard, and that not every problem is anyone's fault. Some are, of course, but not all. And whether any particular issue can or can't be blamed on any particular person or people, bitching about it doesn't ever help the situation.
