Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Universal Declaration of Avatar Rights

kerunix Flan
Registered User
Join date: 3 Sep 2005
Posts: 393
05-03-2006 15:57
Hello !

What about working on a Universal Declaration of Avatar Rights ?
I wish i could start to write it myself, but i'm not good enough to do that.

A few toughts anyway :
- The "humanity" (for human) should be the "virtuality" (for avatar), does it sound good ?

A few articles :
- All avatar are created free and equal in inventory.
- Everyone has the right to roleplay and 1st life privacy.
Vinci Calamari
Free Software Promoter
Join date: 27 Feb 2006
Posts: 192
05-04-2006 06:02
From: kerunix Flan
Hello !

What about working on a Universal Declaration of Avatar Rights ?
I wish i could start to write it myself, but i'm not good enough to do that.

A few toughts anyway :
- The "humanity" (for human) should be the "virtuality" (for avatar), does it sound good ?

A few articles :
- All avatar are created free and equal in inventory.
- Everyone has the right to roleplay and 1st life privacy.


What do u want to protect? The avatar or the humans? i think it makes no sense to give avatars rights as long as every avatar has a human behind. Although.... i do very much like to see non-human avatars (bots / robots) in SL or kind of inworld [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_Linguistic_Internet_Computer_Entity "Alice"] . In all that virtual life that does exist I think it is astonishing that artificial life in SL is still very much reduced to some simple fishs, birds or small pets.
A declaration should protect the rights of artificial life also. I think that this should be an issue much earlier than in RL because artificial life in SL already exists virtually.

Even if artificial life in SL today is property (like animals in RL) I think this life itself could have rights. It would be good if artificial life that has rights would have to follow specific rules that give it that official status. There should also be rules when artificial life can be killed.

Why on earth should we want that:

1.) Its an interesting concept
2.) At some point there will be much more artificial life in SL. Than there should be some rules how interaction can happen. I think AL that is property would make everything more complicated as if all AL has the same status.
3. ) This rules could help RL society to develop rules for AL long before it is deployed in RL.

Right now we can play. But we should start playing with that now.

Back to human avatars: I think these have the human rights so there is no need to protect them. The right of their avatars is their right for privacy.

About right for "role playing": Personally I think role playing is ok, but the problem I see that is more that it is happening too much and that make SL more uninteresting. Usenet has banned anonymity many years ago as unwanted, because in Usenet also there is everything that makes problems like in RL (hate speech, etc.). If there is 100% privacy this means that the ppl hosting the servers will have to deal with all those affairs instead of in RL direct interaction between too persons - they do not have to contact the house owner if the have a problem with each other.

Vinci
_____________________
The SecondTux Linux User Wiki:
http://stux.wikiinfo.org
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
05-04-2006 07:24
All avatars, or humans, are created equal... except when they aren't... but for some reason we're too afraid to admit that even that tenous equality doesn't persist past the first few years of life, if that.
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
Kevn Klein
God is Love!
Join date: 5 Nov 2004
Posts: 3,422
05-04-2006 08:12
We are all equal, it's just that some are more equal than others :D
Desmond Shang
Guvnah of Caledon
Join date: 14 Mar 2005
Posts: 5,250
05-04-2006 08:38
From: Vinci Calamari
i think it makes no sense to give avatars rights as long as every avatar has a human behind.


I read this sentence *entirely* the wrong way, the first time through.

Carry on, though!
_____________________

Steampunk Victorian, Well-Mannered Caledon!
Crissaegrim Clutterbuck
Dancing Martian Warlord
Join date: 9 Apr 2006
Posts: 277
05-04-2006 08:50
Actually, there is some precedent for the issue of "avatar or human behind it". There were long discussions in the 1700's and again in the early 1900's about whether political, economic, and physical rights and privileges applied to both mind and body, or merely the mind or the body. (Orwell's 1984 encapsulated some of this discussion and is probably the best-known example.)

Considering the avatar as the "body" and the human behind it as the "mind" could be an appropriate analog for SL - then you might have a basis for debate from the earlier work done.
Chromal Brodsky
ExperimentalMetaphysicist
Join date: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 243
05-04-2006 08:54
I wonder if now would be a good time to lecture on the different between user, agent, and avatar. Also, hasn't this already been covered? In a sense, we do have a bill of rights: the terms of service. It tells us what we can expect from Linden Lab...
Crissaegrim Clutterbuck
Dancing Martian Warlord
Join date: 9 Apr 2006
Posts: 277
05-04-2006 09:09
From: Chromal Brodsky
In a sense, we do have a bill of rights: the terms of service. It tells us what we can expect from Linden Lab...


Well, no, not really. The ToS tells us how LL covers itself from potential legal action. That's a very different concept from a resident bill of rights. The real question is whether a court would recognize a bill of rights as having any weight in practical circumstances. I think not at this point. But I think that may change in a few years.

Enforcement is what this issue would devolve on.
Pelanor Eldrich
Let's make a deal...
Join date: 8 Feb 2006
Posts: 267
Raph Koster's Declaration of the Rights of Avatars...
05-08-2006 11:10
I'm not sure that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is really all that salient in a virtual world. Virutal Worlds are occupied by avatars. What do you all think of this document?:

From: Ralph Koster

A Declaration of the Rights of Avatars

When a time comes that new modes and venues exist for communities, and said modes are different enough from the existing ones that question arises as to the applicability of past custom and law; and when said venues have become a forum for interaction and society for the general public regardless of the intent of the creators of said venue; and at a time when said communities and spaces are rising in popularity and are now widely exploited for commercial gain; it behooves those involved in said communities and venues to affirm and declare the inalienable rights of the members of said communities. Therefore herein have been set forth those rights which are inalienable rights of the inhabitants of virtual spaces of all sorts, in their form henceforth referred to as avatars, in order that this declaration may continually remind those who hold power over virtual spaces and the avatars contained therein of their duties and responsibilities; in order that the forms of administration of a virtual space may be at any time compared to that of other virtual spaces; and in order that the grievances of players may hereafter be judged against the explicit rights set forth, to better govern the virtual space and improve the general welfare and happiness of all.

Therefore this document holds the following truths to be self-evident: That avatars are the manifestation of actual people in an online medium, and that their utterances, actions, thoughts, and emotions should be considered to be as valid as the utterances, actions, thoughts, and emotions of people in any other forum, venue, location, or space. That the well-established rights of man approved by the National Assembly of France on August 26th of 1789 do therefore apply to avatars in full measure saving only the aspects of said rights that do not pertain in a virtual space or which must be abrogated in order to ensure the continued existence of the space in question. That by the act of affirming membership in the community within the virtual space, the avatars form a social contract with the community, forming a populace which may and must self-affirm and self-impose rights and concomitant restrictions upon their behavior. That the nature of virtual spaces is such that there must, by physical law, always be a higher power or administrator who maintains the space and has complete power over all participants, but who is undeniably part of the community formed within the space and who must therefore take action in accord with that which benefits the space as well as the participants, and who therefore also has the rights of avatars and may have other rights as well. That the ease of moving between virtual spaces and the potential transience of the community do not limit or reduce the level of emotional and social involvement that avatars may have with the community, and that therefore the ease of moving between virtual spaces and the potential transience of the community do not in any way limit, curtail, or remove these rights from avatars on the alleged grounds that avatars can always simply leave.

Articles:

1. Avatars are created free and equal in rights. Special powers or privileges shall be founded solely on the common good, and not based on whim, favoritism, nepotism, or the caprice of those who hold power. Those who act as ordinary avatars within the space shall all have only the rights of normal avatars.

2. The aim of virtual communities is the common good of its citizenry, from which arise the rights of avatars. Foremost among these rights is the right to be treated as people and not as disembodied, meaningless, soulless puppets. Inherent in this right are therefore the natural and inalienable rights of man. These rights are liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression.

3. The principle of all sovereignty in a virtual space resides in the inalterable fact that somewhere there resides an individual who controls the hardware on which the virtual space is running, and the software with which it is created, and the database which makes up its existence. However, the body populace has the right to know and demand the enforcement of the standards by which this individual uses this power over the community, as authority must proceed from the community; a community that does not know the standards by which the administrators use their power is a community which permits its administrators to have no standards, and is therefore a community abetting in tyranny.

4. Liberty consists of the freedom to do anything which injures no one else including the weal of the community as a whole and as an entity instantiated on hardware and by software; the exercise of the natural rights of avatars are therefore limited solely by the rights of other avatars sharing the same space and participating in the same community. These limits can only be determined by a clear code of conduct.

5. The code of conduct can only prohibit those actions and utterances that are hurtful to society, inclusive of the harm that may be done to the fabric of the virtual space via hurt done to the hardware, software, or data; and likewise inclusive of the harm that may be done to the individual who maintains said hardware, software, or data, in that harm done to this individual may result in direct harm done to the community.

6. The code of conduct is the expression of the general will of the community and the will of the individual who maintains the hardware and software that makes up the virtual space. Every member of the community has the right to contribute either directly or via representatives in the shaping of the code of conduct as the culture of the virtual space evolves, particularly as it evolves in directions that the administrator did not predict; the ultimate right of the administrator to shape and define the code of conduct shall not be abrogated, but it is clear that the administrator therefore has the duty and responsibility to work with the community to arrive at a code of conduct that is shaped by the input of the community. As a member of the community himself, the administrator would be damaging the community itself if he failed in this responsibility, for abrogation of this right of avatars could result in the loss of population and therefore damage to the common weal.

7. No avatar shall be accused, muzzled, toaded, jailed, banned, or otherwise punished except in the cases and according to the forms prescribed by the code of conduct. Any one soliciting, transmitting, executing, or causing to be executed, any arbitrary order, shall be punished, even if said individual is one who has been granted special powers or privileges within the virtual space. But any avatar summoned or arrested in virtue of the code of conduct shall submit without delay, as resistance constitutes an offense.

8. The code of conduct shall provide for such punishments only as are strictly and obviously necessary, and no one shall suffer punishment except it be legally inflicted according to the provisions of a code of conduct promulgated before the commission of the offense; save in the case where the offense endangered the continued existence of the virtual space by attacking the hardware or software that provide the physical existence of the space.

9. As all avatars are held innocent until they shall have been declared guilty, if detainment, temporary banning, jailing, gluing, freezing, or toading shall be deemed indispensable, all harshness not essential to the securing of the prisoner's person shall be severely repressed by the code of conduct.

10. No one shall be disquieted on account of his opinions, provided their manifestation does not disturb the public order established by the code of conduct.

11. The free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man. Every avatar may, accordingly, speak, write, chat, post, and print with freedom, but shall be responsible for such abuses of this freedom as shall be defined by the code of conduct, most particularly the abuse of affecting the performance of the space or the performance of a given avatar's representation of the space.

12. The security of the rights of avatars requires the existence of avatars with special powers and privileges, who are empowered to enforce the provisions of the code of conduct. These powers and privileges are therefore granted for the good of all and not for the personal advantage of those to whom they shall be entrusted. These powers and privileges are also therefore not an entitlement, and can and should be removed in any instance where they are no longer used for the good of all, even if the offense is merely inactivity.

13. A common contribution may, at the discretion of the individual who maintains the hardware, the software, and the data that make up the virtual space, be required in order to maintain the existence of avatars who enforce the code of conduct and to maintain the hardware and the software and the continued existence of the virtual space. Avatars have the right to know the nature and amount of the contribution in advance, and said required contribution should be equitably distributed among all the citizens without regard to their social position; special rights and privileges shall never pertain to the avatar who contributes more except insofar as the special powers and privileges require greater resources from the hardware, software, or data store, and would not be possible save for the resources obtainable with the contribution; and as long as any and all avatars are able to make this contribution and therefore gain the powers and privileges if they so choose; nor shall any articles of this declaration be contingent upon a contribution being made.

14. The community has the right to require of every administrator or individual with special powers and privileges granted for the purpose of administration, an account of his administration.

15. A virtual community in which the observance of the code of conduct is not assured and universal, nor the separation of powers defined, has no constitution at all.

16. Since property is an inviolable and sacred right, and the virtual equivalent is integrity and persistence of data, no one shall be deprived thereof except where public necessity, legally determined per the code of conduct, shall clearly demand it, and then only on condition that the avatar shall have been previously and equitably indemnified, saving only cases wherein the continued existence of the space is jeopardized by the existence or integrity of said data.

17. The administrators of the virtual space shall not abridge the freedom of assembly, save to preserve the performance and continued viability of the virtual space.

18. Avatars have the right to be secure in their persons, communications, designated private spaces, and effects, against unreasonable snooping, eavesdropping, searching and seizures, no activity pertaining thereto shall be undertaken by administrators save with probable cause supported by affirmation, particularly describing the goal of said investigations.

19. The enumeration in this document of rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by avatars.