11-07-2005 21:47
I haven't checked the other posts, but here's my two bits about current situations and suggestions on how to improve them.

There should be a built-in anti-push feature that has to be turned off if you want to push and/or be pushed around in the game of Second Life. You should not be required to wear one, or script your own or even buy one to be safe from random immature people. I can't tell you how many times I have been standing around, minding my own business just to be launched three sims away from where I was..

I have crashed sooo many times recently, too.. not the computer, but mostly the client itself. Just the other day, the game screwed itself seven times in a row. Maybe it's just me, but that's just plain annoying -- soo, why not credit each reported crash 10L? Seems only fair.

For those of us who must run SL in window mode, or in a small resolution full-screen becuase of limited system resources or becuase we like to multi-task; the edit window should be allowed to be moved outside the SL client window. That thing sucks up space like no one's business. It too is quite annoying to work around and having to minimize and reopen it many times or move it around while editing becomes very tedious.

Also, removing all the negitive feedbacks from everyone's account was a mistake in my opinion. A lot of people deserved their 20+ negitive feedbacks and I don't think it's fair for the people who never accrued any bad marks. Therefore I propose that one negitive category be returned; with all their original marks -- Behavior. You can tell appearance and building skills that's a no brainer, however being able to tell if someone is a good person is another issue all together. Even though this would have absolutely no bearing on stipends, it would give myself and many others a piece of mind; or at the very least return the negitive behavior scores obtained up until the recent upgrade returned.

A few people didn't deserve their negitives, this is true; it should however be able to be contested if the person rated in spite not becuase of purely bad behavior (tone of the conversation should also be considered in these instances). If this was already a feature, then y'know.. go Lidens.

Anyway, that's it! hopefully some of these suggestions will be seriously considered.. and if suggested already.. I'm with.. whomever suggested it!