Jauani Wu
pancake rabbit
Join date: 7 Apr 2003
Posts: 3,835
|
09-13-2004 13:34
THere is a need for a feature that allows group officers to maintain land in terms of terraform, access, etc, but not sell the land.
I have a situation where I wish to donate the land to the group. What protects me from having another officer selling the land?
at the scale of a sim, this is a big problem.
what i suggest is
officer privileges to avatar owned land that is "Set" to a group.
or
a more complicated deeding system.
or
a third over arching group level which has authority on land sales.
this is important for situations like ours where one player is donating the land and when the project is disolved, wishes to take the land back.
to me, this feature is urgent.
_____________________
http://wu-had.blogspot.com/ read my blog
Mecha Jauani Wu hero of justice __________________________________________________ "Oh Jauani, you're terrible." - khamon fate
|
Jauani Wu
pancake rabbit
Join date: 7 Apr 2003
Posts: 3,835
|
09-13-2004 16:25
is nobody else interested in this?
_____________________
http://wu-had.blogspot.com/ read my blog
Mecha Jauani Wu hero of justice __________________________________________________ "Oh Jauani, you're terrible." - khamon fate
|
Moleculor Satyr
Fireflies!
Join date: 5 Jan 2004
Posts: 2,650
|
09-13-2004 16:40
Oh, there are tons who are interested. We just know the futility of asking for new features when what we have is so screwed up right now.
_____________________
</sarcasm>
|
Khamon Fate
fategardens.net
Join date: 21 Nov 2003
Posts: 4,177
|
09-13-2004 22:27
i posted this:
"one thing i'd like to see is a third level of membership. currently:
officers share the money/cost, can manage objects and edit land;
members share the money and can edit objects.
what i'd like to have are:
officers that share the money, can manage objects and edit land;
managers that share the money and can manage objects;
members that only share the money.
if this is too simplistic, i do support the idea of officers being able to create folders to drop members into. those folders could then be assigned various combinations of group permissions, costs and benefits. i don't remember who proposed this; but it's a good idea."
in a new in second life thread earlier this month. didn't get any replies then either.
we have a checkbox for deeding allocation with property. would it work to add a checkbox that granted the right for other officers to sell the land? that could then be unchecked if the owner was "loaning" the land to the group but wanted to retain retail control over it.
_____________________
Visit the Fate Gardens Website @ fategardens.net
|
Jauani Wu
pancake rabbit
Join date: 7 Apr 2003
Posts: 3,835
|
09-26-2004 18:12
lindens, has this suggestion registered on your radar? i am just curious what the official position is on the current weaknesses of the group land system.
_____________________
http://wu-had.blogspot.com/ read my blog
Mecha Jauani Wu hero of justice __________________________________________________ "Oh Jauani, you're terrible." - khamon fate
|
Haney Linden
Senior Member
Join date: 3 Oct 2002
Posts: 990
|
09-26-2004 21:08
Thank you for your ideas. Yes, the suggestions have registered. We know we need to fix the group land tools. The current features were designed and created before the land revolution of 1.2.
|