|
Musicteacher Rampal
Registered User
Join date: 20 Feb 2004
Posts: 824
|
07-26-2006 14:37
Prop. 1689
LL says they don't respond to minors in SL quickly enough because they have so many abuse reports to look through. Assuming they can sort them by category, adding a category of "Suspected Minor in SL" should help them sort out these more quickly and take faster action to investigate and ultimately get minors out of SL more quickly.
Vote if you think it's important!
*edit* how do you add a forum URL for the discussion thread after posting the proposal??
|
|
Macphisto Angelus
JAFO
Join date: 21 Oct 2004
Posts: 5,831
|
07-26-2006 15:18
I think it would be great, but here is the only snag. LL themselves could never prove if they are a minor or not based on the new free for all admission system. The only solution is going to be when LL decides this policy is not working and goes back to verification policies.
_____________________
From: Natalie P from SLU Second Life: Where being the super important, extra special person you've always been sure you are (at least when you're drunk) can be a reality! From: Ann Launay I put on my robe and wizard ha... Oh. Nevermind then.
|
|
Torley Linden
Enlightenment!
Join date: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 16,530
|
07-26-2006 15:24
I agree this important--we've got this listed as part of a bigger abuse report improval process. So just saying I'll include this thread and the proposal! Thanks guys.
|
|
Haravikk Mistral
Registered User
Join date: 8 Oct 2005
Posts: 2,482
|
07-26-2006 15:30
From: Macphisto Angelus I think it would be great, but here is the only snag. LL themselves could never prove if they are a minor or not based on the new free for all admission system. The only solution is going to be when LL decides this policy is not working and goes back to verification policies. I agree with Macphisto, how can LL react against someone who is accused of being underage, I've heard of people being frozen right away until they give proof of age, which seems absurd because it means a witch-hunt could ensue where people make false accusations to get each other frozen. But all that is worse if there is nothing to prove or disprove with. Everyone should reqire payment info, SL should really go back to paid basic accounts, or have restricted free accounts that can only explore a guaranteed PG area until they decide to upgrade to see the wider world (requiring payment and payment info). To combat griefing as well as underage participants!
_____________________
Computer (Mac Pro): 2 x Quad Core 3.2ghz Xeon 10gb DDR2 800mhz FB-DIMMS 4 x 750gb, 32mb cache hard-drives (RAID-0/striped) NVidia GeForce 8800GT (512mb)
|
|
Torley Linden
Enlightenment!
Join date: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 16,530
|
07-26-2006 15:41
Specifically I should clarify that "suspected" underage is NOT good enough. However, someone admitting "i am 14 on the mg". Now THAT is taken seriously. So, what I said earlier only applies to those types of cases, but it still stands: good to have a category for underage. 
|