|
Jiffies Manimal
Registered User
Join date: 22 Jan 2005
Posts: 5
|
05-07-2005 07:38
For an vote it says we should discuss it in teh forum first, so here we go.
The below functions i think would aid rental and content managing on land, allowing the possability to script autoreturning of items.
And the posability of automatic scripting for personal sandboxes.
Automation of parcel object usage.
All these functions should only work on owned by script owner.
integer llParcelReturnObjects(key user)
- Action: return all objects corresponding to the keyed user
- Returns: number of objects returned
integer llParcelDeleteObjects(key user)
- Action: deletes all objects corresponding to the keyed user
- Returns: number of objects returned
(would this function be safe?, possible grief of deleting objects somone drops on parcel)
(how about deletion of no-copy or no-transfer items ?)
list llParcelListObjects()
- Action: gathers a list of all users that have objects on the current parcel.
- Returns: list of keys corresponding to users
integer llParcelGetPrims(key user)
- Action: Counts all the prims on current parcel that belongs to keyed user.
- Returns: integer ammount of prims
|
|
Lindar Lehane
registered user
Join date: 13 Mar 2005
Posts: 272
|
05-08-2005 20:38
Hmmmm...
Help me see why this should have other than a low priority.
When is this urgent enough to demand automation, rather than a visit from the landowner?
If prim-dump attacks are a problem, set create off.
If you need litter collection to make space for owners new prims, I guess you would be planning auto-genning them, otherwise you could clean up by hand. Better that way, an admirer might have left you a rose.
Hmmmm.. can't see a lot of need just off the cuff.....
|
|
Flyingroc Chung
:)
Join date: 3 Jun 2004
Posts: 329
|
05-08-2005 21:32
I could see how these functions could be useful for rental systems to monitor whether renters are over their prim limits.
|
|
Legith Fairplay
SL Scripter
Join date: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 189
|
05-08-2005 21:35
From: Lindar Lehane Hmmmm...
Help me see why this should have other than a low priority.
When is this urgent enough to demand automation, rather than a visit from the landowner?
If prim-dump attacks are a problem, set create off.
If you need litter collection to make space for owners new prims, I guess you would be planning auto-genning them, otherwise you could clean up by hand. Better that way, an admirer might have left you a rose.
Hmmmm.. can't see a lot of need just off the cuff..... Where they would be most useful is in land and apartment rentals. Stores/malls (while I'm sure would use it) the owner should visit the location anyway. in the rental sense these commands could be used to return objects of others at the request of the tenant, without waiting for the land lord. However I must admit (in particularly since I don't have any rentals in world at the moment.) that its not high on my list, I'd rather a more secure money transfer than llGiveMoney(). or ways of checking my balance from a script. And those are still dwarfed by havoc2, mono, and better script time slicing being implemented. (since that will both increase the power available to scripts, and make the CPU usage more fair) |