|
Cyber Metropolitan
Registered User
Join date: 10 May 2005
Posts: 33
|
03-31-2006 17:32
I think Second Life should have a better crime report system,And they should put the name of the user who did the crime or the group of the crime and where and they did it,And if they did any type of crime they should get a fine or get banned from useing Second Life.
|
|
Aaron Levy
Medicated Lately?
Join date: 3 Jun 2004
Posts: 2,147
|
03-31-2006 17:32
I agree -- my local newspaper prints the names of people who broke the rules. Why can't LL?
|
|
Susie Boffin
Certified Nutcase
Join date: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 2,151
|
03-31-2006 20:23
I also agree. In the USof A ,anyway, convictions are a matter of public record plus I want to know which scumbags to avoid in Second Life.
_____________________
"If you see a man approaching you with the obvious intent of doing you good, you should run for your life." - Henry David Thoreau
|
|
Eep Quirk
Absolutely Relative
Join date: 15 Dec 2004
Posts: 1,211
|
03-31-2006 22:49
Yes. People can remain anonymous too easily in SL--especially with multiple alts. I think alts shouldn't be allowed--or, if they are, too explicitly list them in the profile. Make people responsible for their actions and subject to public humiliation/shaming!
|
|
Sco Jimenez
Registered User
Join date: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 13
|
04-13-2006 10:31
I agree
|
|
Stone Taggart
Wolf Vagrant of Trades
Join date: 12 Mar 2006
Posts: 12
|
04-14-2006 17:42
I believe that if you do something overtly harmful to a community, you are willingly sacrificing your right to anonymity. If you impede on others' rights, you must be meaning that you don't want any for yourself either. Simple.
[Rant; Read at your own risk (Select text to view)]
Repeat criminals aren't like real people; they have parts missing in their programming, so-to-speak. Defective. Sometimes society itself can damage the goods, and that's sad, but the solution is in rehabilitating the society, not trying to glue together pieces that aren't even all-there anymore.
In varying degrees, a dangerous person loses part of their being-a-person. There is a definite point where a Being, human or otherwise, can degenerate to little more than an autonimous meatslab that occasionally regurgitates fragments of speech generated back when it still had a soul. I.E. homicide addicts, certain variants of psychopaths, the exact point where the brain involved is no longer capable of preventing harmful behavior.
Condemning the criminally insane to death isn't cruel, it's practically merciful.
[/Rant]
*ahem* anyways, that's that for today's ventilation of caustic sludge on THIS topic.
|
