|
hope Antonelli
Registered User
Join date: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 155
|
11-12-2006 12:10
What good does it do to vote if the last feature that was even acknowledged was 2 months ago? There is at least one I have voted for more attachment points that has over 1000 votes, and yet (despite the over 500 we look at it hype) it hasnt even deserved a 'yes we can do this' or a 'we'll look into it' note.
|
|
Vincent Nacon
Reseacher & Developer
Join date: 1 Mar 2006
Posts: 111
|
11-12-2006 17:14
ever thought maybe people are being silly by putting their votes in a prop where it's already more than done?
what's more attachment point you really need? come on... we have 35 points, that's quite enough already.
_____________________
A new horizon is coming... but what?
|
|
Stephen Zenith
Registered User
Join date: 15 May 2006
Posts: 1,029
|
11-12-2006 18:38
From: Vincent Nacon ever thought maybe people are being silly by putting their votes in a prop where it's already more than done?
what's more attachment point you really need? come on... we have 35 points, that's quite enough already. The fact the it has over 1000 votes suggests that it is by no means "quite enough", and in actual fact is "painfully inadequate" for some of us.
|
|
Haravikk Mistral
Registered User
Join date: 8 Oct 2005
Posts: 2,482
|
11-13-2006 01:57
From: Vincent Nacon what's more attachment point you really need? come on... we have 35 points, that's quite enough already. We don't need more attachment points really, we need more attachments PER attachment point with a hard limit for total attachments, that way you can have more attachments on your legs if that's where you need them, and leave other places empty. All those people's votes in the wrong place, heh. But I'm pretty sure all LL cares about at the moment is adding a few token features and raising prices for the wrong people.
_____________________
Computer (Mac Pro): 2 x Quad Core 3.2ghz Xeon 10gb DDR2 800mhz FB-DIMMS 4 x 750gb, 32mb cache hard-drives (RAID-0/striped) NVidia GeForce 8800GT (512mb)
|
|
Argent Stonecutter
Emergency Mustelid
Join date: 20 Sep 2005
Posts: 20,263
|
11-13-2006 08:18
From: Haravikk Mistral We don't need more attachment points really, we need more attachments PER attachment point with a hard limit for total attachments, that way you can have more attachments on your legs if that's where you need them, and leave other places empty. I like "more attachment points" better. There's too much stuff that depends on one-attachment-per-point, both in scripts and in objects that are *supposed* to replace different versions of themselves when you drag them onto your avatar.
|
|
hope Antonelli
Registered User
Join date: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 155
|
11-13-2006 13:25
Its more like obvious things..we need a neck attachment point so people can wear collars AND a necklace if they like. a forehead attachment for things like bangs or whatever so your lips are free for a lipr ring or even a set of scripted lips..a layer where you can attach tattoos without taking up clothing spots..and if youve seen silks or a lot of the flexi outfits lately they can have 10-12 pieces in them. And especially for furries, whose AV's take almost every spot without allowing them room for clothing. It doesnt matter to me whether they add extra points, or the ability to add more than one piece per attachment point.
|