Second Life Forums Archive - Group Inventory

Olmy Seraph

Valued Member

Join date: 1 Nov 2004

Posts: 502

05-07-2005 01:08

Proposal Number: 321

Add a top level folder to the inventory window, Groups. Under Groups would be a folder for each group the av belongs to. For example...

+ Groups
. + Dread Pirates
. . + Clothing
. . . Revenge shirt
. . . Black boots
. . + Objects
. . . Duelling Sword
. . + Textures
. . . Jolly Roger Flag
. + Edifice Rex
. . + Notecards
. . . Ballot Template
+ Library
+ My Objects

Items with copy/trans permissions could be moved or copied to the group inventory, which would make them available to group members.

Rezzed objects that are deeded to group that are returned would go back to the group inventory, rather than disappearing completely.

Items deleted from group folders would be available in each av's trash until it is emptied.

Maybe only officers can add/move/delete items in group folders. Just thinking...

_____________________

Some people are like Slinkies... not really good for anything, but they sure bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.

Khamon Fate

fategardens.net

Join date: 21 Nov 2003

Posts: 4,177

05-07-2005 08:26

See I've asked about this at a town hall ages ago, emailed it, per request, in a long list of compiled group code proposals to a Linden design team several months ago, and posted it in numerous feature suggestion threads, and NOW I have to go vote for it on a website to the exclusion of other necessary features.

I just really finally completely give up. Linden Lab can develop the Second Life software any way they like. It will make no difference to me whatsoever.

_____________________

Visit the Fate Gardens Website @ fategardens.net

Olmy Seraph

Valued Member

Join date: 1 Nov 2004

Posts: 502

05-07-2005 09:00

From: Khamon Fate

See I've asked about this at a town hall ages ago, emailed it, per request, in a long list of compiled group code proposals to a Linden design team several months ago, and posted it in numerous feature suggestion threads, and NOW I have to go vote for it on a website to the exclusion of other necessary features.

I know, this idea has been talked around for a long time. I didn't see it on the feature voting, so I put it up there. But I don't think that this voting process is necessarily a bad way to go. The fact that such an obviously useful idea has gone so long without being implemented speaks to the fact that LL is limited in how much they can accomplish. I like that there is now a visible, open system for documenting which features people want the most. The voting system still has some problems to be smoothed out, but overall I think it's a step in the right direction.

Now, if you want to discuss LL's attitude toward feature development or the flaws of the voting system, can you please spawn a separate thread? It would be nice if this one didn't get completely hijacked and the discussion of the group inventory feature get lost in that noise.

_____________________

Some people are like Slinkies... not really good for anything, but they sure bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.

Nekokami Dragonfly

猫神

Join date: 29 Aug 2004

Posts: 638

05-07-2005 10:05

Sounds like a good proposal to me. I've never understood what "share with group" does, but this is what I wish it would do. I'll give it a vote or two as soon as I get some votes back from the high priority things I've already voted on, assuming the Lindens ever get around to approving some of them.

neko

_____________________

Help build InnerLife, a biofeedback adventure in Second Life
Please Vote:
Prop: 203 - Support local devices beyond mouse and keyboard
Prop: 201 - Scriptable Avatar Prims/NPCs/Mannequins/Animals
Prop: 199 - Capes, Cloaks, Coats, Veils, Belts, etc.

Group Inventory
Olmy Seraph Valued Member Join date: 1 Nov 2004 Posts: 502	05-07-2005 01:08 Proposal Number: 321 Add a top level folder to the inventory window, Groups. Under Groups would be a folder for each group the av belongs to. For example... + Groups . + Dread Pirates . . + Clothing . . . Revenge shirt . . . Black boots . . + Objects . . . Duelling Sword . . + Textures . . . Jolly Roger Flag . + Edifice Rex . . + Notecards . . . Ballot Template + Library + My Objects Items with copy/trans permissions could be moved or copied to the group inventory, which would make them available to group members. Rezzed objects that are deeded to group that are returned would go back to the group inventory, rather than disappearing completely. Items deleted from group folders would be available in each av's trash until it is emptied. Maybe only officers can add/move/delete items in group folders. Just thinking... _____________________ Some people are like Slinkies... not really good for anything, but they sure bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
Khamon Fate fategardens.net Join date: 21 Nov 2003 Posts: 4,177	05-07-2005 08:26 See I've asked about this at a town hall ages ago, emailed it, per request, in a long list of compiled group code proposals to a Linden design team several months ago, and posted it in numerous feature suggestion threads, and NOW I have to go vote for it on a website to the exclusion of other necessary features. I just really finally completely give up. Linden Lab can develop the Second Life software any way they like. It will make no difference to me whatsoever. _____________________ Visit the Fate Gardens Website @ fategardens.net
Olmy Seraph Valued Member Join date: 1 Nov 2004 Posts: 502	05-07-2005 09:00 From: Khamon Fate See I've asked about this at a town hall ages ago, emailed it, per request, in a long list of compiled group code proposals to a Linden design team several months ago, and posted it in numerous feature suggestion threads, and NOW I have to go vote for it on a website to the exclusion of other necessary features. I know, this idea has been talked around for a long time. I didn't see it on the feature voting, so I put it up there. But I don't think that this voting process is necessarily a bad way to go. The fact that such an obviously useful idea has gone so long without being implemented speaks to the fact that LL is limited in how much they can accomplish. I like that there is now a visible, open system for documenting which features people want the most. The voting system still has some problems to be smoothed out, but overall I think it's a step in the right direction. Now, if you want to discuss LL's attitude toward feature development or the flaws of the voting system, can you please spawn a separate thread? It would be nice if this one didn't get completely hijacked and the discussion of the group inventory feature get lost in that noise. _____________________ Some people are like Slinkies... not really good for anything, but they sure bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
Nekokami Dragonfly 猫神 Join date: 29 Aug 2004 Posts: 638	05-07-2005 10:05 Sounds like a good proposal to me. I've never understood what "share with group" does, but this is what I wish it would do. I'll give it a vote or two as soon as I get some votes back from the high priority things I've already voted on, assuming the Lindens ever get around to approving some of them. neko _____________________ Help build InnerLife, a biofeedback adventure in Second Life Please Vote: Prop: 203 - Support local devices beyond mouse and keyboard Prop: 201 - Scriptable Avatar Prims/NPCs/Mannequins/Animals Prop: 199 - Capes, Cloaks, Coats, Veils, Belts, etc.

Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

Group Inventory