Please define!
|
|
Sensual Casanova
Spoiled Brat
Join date: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 4,807
|
11-25-2004 02:16
Please define "nasty", "hateful", "bitter".... On several occasions I have been called names on these forums by Cristiano Midnight, some of the things he has said has been very slanderous and untrue. Several times he has said I am "nasty" and "bitter", amung other things... So my question is, how is that every single time I post something in disagreement, I end up getting bashed? Who is really the nasty,bitter, hateful person/people? Here is a mild example from the animation forums... From: someone by Sensual Casanova
If you are creating this pose from scratch, why would you have to change frame 1 (an animation yet to be created) to prevent it from sinking in the ground, or being to high? this makes no sense... From: Cristiano Midnight Did you even bother to read it? The point is to adjust the frame after you have made your pose/animation if you import it and find it too high or too low. What makes no sense to me is you having to post negatively in every thread you can find. I wondered how long it would take for you to rear your ugly head.
Makes me wonder what one would call Cristiano's behavior? How many times I am going to get a personal attack thrown at me when I disagree with someone? |
|
Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
|
11-25-2004 02:39
From: Sensual Casanova Please define "nasty", "hateful", "bitter"....
You.
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
|
|
billy Madison
www.SLAuctions.com
Join date: 6 Jun 2004
Posts: 2,175
|
11-25-2004 03:01
Agreed. The reason for this sensual is 99% of what you post is either negative in nature or in the shopping forums. The only time i have seen you in these parts is when you are being negative. |
|
Sensual Casanova
Spoiled Brat
Join date: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 4,807
|
11-25-2004 03:02
negative is one thing, I often post when I disagree with something...
But hateful and immature name calling is another.
And I know this thread will open it up to some more bashing since the ones that will probably reply are the ones I dont agree with.... but it's ok I am a big girl, I can take it.
|
|
Willow Zander
Having Blahgasms
Join date: 22 May 2004
Posts: 9,935
|
11-25-2004 03:22
But whats the point, ya know someones just gunna say something to get the thread closed, and cos you've named someone personally, jeska or robin are just gunna come along and close it, saying its personal stuff.. All this bitching and backstabbing is getting so goddam tiresome now 
_____________________
*I'm not ready for the world outside...I keep pretending, but I just can't hide...* <3 Giddeon's <3
|
|
Kris Ritter
paradoxical embolism
Join date: 31 Oct 2003
Posts: 6,627
|
11-25-2004 03:23
Hmm. Interesting, Nolan. Brings to mind a few questions... if someone produces a list of accusations that have been levelled at them like this and you second them with a one word agreement like that, is it still a personal attack? Will they still try and report it as one? Will the Lindens agree? Will they be remotely consistent in their dealing with it anyway? I didn't realise Sensual's 'please define' thread was about defining her personally til I read your post - mainly because she's the only person I permanently have on my Ignore List on the forums - and now you made me read her post, dammit, Nolan! But it sounds like it could be an interesting thread. My forum crucifixion was last week. I sure hope they let hers go as far with a no-holds-barred free-for-all since she's inviting it! I'd love to see how many other opinions coincide with mine. Of course, I'm not allowed to participate. Following the Lindens assertions that I've been making 'weeks of personal attacks' on people, I'm on probation, so I can't tell Sensual or anyone else what I think of them atm. Ho hum. *waves torch and pitchfork enthusiastically from the back of the crowd* |
|
Willow Zander
Having Blahgasms
Join date: 22 May 2004
Posts: 9,935
|
11-25-2004 03:25
YAY your back... oops starting a conversation in a thread, *sighs* oh well it's gunna get locked anyways sooo.....
*huggggerz*
_____________________
*I'm not ready for the world outside...I keep pretending, but I just can't hide...* <3 Giddeon's <3
|
|
Lynn Lippmann
Toe Jammer
Join date: 12 Jun 2003
Posts: 793
|
11-25-2004 03:37
IF you would have read further into that forum post, you would have found that the posters after Cris agreed that it was unnecessary to change 120 frames. And that's not a personal attack. 
_____________________
They give us new smilies  but what about the TOES? Toe the line Linden's! Toes for the Toeless!
|
|
Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
|
11-25-2004 04:22
From: Kris Ritter Hmm. Interesting, Nolan. Brings to mind a few questions... if someone produces a list of accusations that have been levelled at them like this and you second them with a one word agreement like that, is it still a personal attack? Will they still try and report it as one? Will the Lindens agree? Will they be remotely consistent in their dealing with it anyway?
I didn't realise Sensual's 'please define' thread was about defining her personally til I read your post - mainly because she's the only person I permanently have on my Ignore List on the forums - and now you made me read her post, dammit, Nolan! But it sounds like it could be an interesting thread. My forum crucifixion was last week. I sure hope they let hers go as far with a no-holds-barred free-for-all since she's inviting it! I'd love to see how many other opinions coincide with mine.
Of course, I'm not allowed to participate. Following the Lindens assertions that I've been making 'weeks of personal attacks' on people, I'm on probation, so I can't tell Sensual or anyone else what I think of them atm. Ho hum.
*waves torch and pitchfork enthusiastically from the back of the crowd* Please ban me for anti-inflamatory inflamatories, I need a vacation from this cesspool of excuses and off the cuff incendiary remarks. (not you Kris, your still my queen, subjunction 4... )
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
|
|
Nolan Nash
Frischer Frosch
Join date: 15 May 2003
Posts: 7,141
|
11-25-2004 04:35
Waits for lock down silently with elbows on knees while reading *A Day No Pigs Would Die*.
_____________________
“Time's fun when you're having flies.” ~Kermit
|
|
Ursa Falcone
Rocket Scientist
Join date: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 1,989
|
11-25-2004 04:58
*whistles a happy tune*
_____________________
From: someone Jeska Linden: I'm closing this thread because it's obviously overstepped the boundaries of useful conversation, even for the off-topic forum.
|
|
Talen Morgan
Amused
Join date: 2 Apr 2004
Posts: 3,097
|
11-25-2004 06:52
Its Thanksgiving lets all get oiled up and hug  |
|
Torrid Midnight
Work in progress
Join date: 13 May 2003
Posts: 814
|
11-25-2004 07:04
Sensual, I don't know you very well and I'm only going to say this from reading alot of threads where you've posted. You seem to enjoy playing devil's advocate perhaps? I'm not going to say you're a mean or rude person because I don't know you but I can say that just about every thread I've read you've stepped in and disagreed. I just find it difficult to think one person can disagree with so much lol. I just thought well, hmm, perhaps she likes to stimulate heated discussion? That was the only opinion I really formed.
|
|
Selador Cellardoor
Registered User
Join date: 16 Nov 2003
Posts: 3,082
|
11-25-2004 08:08
Talen, Yet another sensible method of conflict resolution!  |
|
Haney Linden
Senior Member
Join date: 3 Oct 2002
Posts: 990
|
11-25-2004 08:24
Threads that are addressed to a single individual are inappropriate on the forums and so this thread is locked.
|
