From: Eve Cartier
Chosen,
First and foremost, I ASSURE you and I can and do build very.. very.. very well. Jukitude (Junkieism?) will do that to you.
Second, can you tell I like lists.
Third, very well, I retract the word "crap". It was not meant to degrade any particular item/clothing/script and obviously distracted you from the real purpose of my rant. I hearby change the word "crap" to "things".
However, this is where I find your disagreement interesting. You point out that you need to find a way to make money. This "need" is what I am focusing this little rant on. Does anyone "need" to own an entire sim? Does anyone "need' to own land bigger than 1026 so they can desing their floating castle? Does anyone "need" to have 500,000L in order to create great art? I submit you do not.
I take a step further and say that our current form of education is what drives this thought. We are no longer educated, but rather, given job training. We are churned out to work, not to think. Long gone are the days of thought and crativity and we are pushed now into filling the cog spot int he great machine of commercialism.
All I am trying to say is that I find it interesting that when given the unlimitless, we box ourselves up and slap a pricetag on it.
Before I begin, thanks for clarifying your definition of "crap". I hereby retract my statements about it being insulting.
Now that that's out of the way, let's adress this question of "need". I'll answer your questions in the order they were asked:
From: Eve Cartier
Does anyone "need" to own an entire sim?
No, and no one "needs" to play SL at all either. For that matter, no one "needs" to eat steak when bread & water will sustain life just fine. One must question though whether the quality of such a bread & water life would be worth living.
From: Eve Cartier
Does anyone "need' to own land bigger than 1026 so they can desing their floating castle?
If the castle is bigger than that, then logically the answer is yes. Your real question then becomes does anyone "need" such a castle. Well, let's draw a RL comparison here. I assume you live in a house or an apartment. All you really "need" is ground under your feet and some sort of roof over your head. You could certainly live in a cave or under a tree, but you choose to live in a house or in an apartment because you're happier there than you would be in a cave or a tree. That means the ultimate question is do you "need" to be happy. This calls into question the very definition of the word "need".
The dictionary defines it as a condition in which something is required or wanted, a requisite. I believe that definition is somewhat incomplete though, as there is no sense of purpose behind the words. "Need" is a relative, subjective term (or else we would not be able to discuss it as we are), and such a dry definition does not provide for relativity. In other words, the question must be asked, a condition in which something is required or wanted for what?
I would therefore complete the definition by calling it that which is required in order to achieve a given goal. It is only in reference to a goal that the degree of requirement, the "need", can be discussed inteligently.
If your goal is merely to be alive, then all you "need" is oxygen, basic metabolic nourishment, water, and temperature. That's it. (Conversely, if your goal is not to be alive, then you don't "need" anything.) However, if your goal is to enjoy life, then you "need" the presence of whatever it is that makes you happy. The list is obviously infinitely variable and endless for what must be present in that regard, and is completely different for each and every one of us (many of us don't even know what's on our own list). Now, if for someone that list happens to include a 1027 meter floating castle, then yes, that person "needs" more land than 1026.
Speaking of 1026, I'm not sure where you're getting this arbitrary number, but I think your point is you believe everyone should be content with their own little pre-sized cubicle and be perfectly happy to live within those confines. Putting aside the obvious question of who the hell are you to decide what anyone else should or shouldn't have, I must point out that the Russians used to have a word for that kind of mentality; they called it communism. If you recall, it didn't work very well, and it didn't last very long.
I would submit that to be fully alive as human beings we very much do in fact "need" to be able to attain more than we "need".
So then, does anyone even "need" to be alive? Well, that's a bigger question than I think we can tackle here, so I'll just leave that one alone for now.
From: Eve Cartier
Does anyone "need" to have 500,000L in order to create great art?
This is the only goal-oriented "need" question you've asked. I would say the answer depends largely on the definition of "great art". If your project requires 50,000 texture uploads, then yes, you'd absolutely need L$500,000. If your project is large and requires a lot of land to support it, then you might "need" that kind of money in order to be able to confidently expect that you can sustain the project financially. I could go on forever naming scenerios, but I think you get the point. You can't dictate what is and what isn't a reasonable amount of money to spend in the process of making whatever it is you consider to be "great art". I could make a scultpure out of twigs, which would cost nothing, or I could make it out of gold and jewels, which would cost a fortune. Which one I "need" to use is, again, entirely dependant on what the goal of the project is.
From: Eve Cartier
I take a step further and say that our current form of education is what drives this thought. We are no longer educated, but rather, given job training. We are churned out to work, not to think. Long gone are the days of thought and crativity and we are pushed now into filling the cog spot int he great machine of commercialism.
Wow, that's quite a cospiracy theory you've got there. Iresponse I'll say I don't know about you, but I do consider myself to be a pretty well educated person. Some of that education has to do with job skills (which I believe I have in abundance) but most of it has to do with things that are far more abstract than that. I'll agree with you that there is certainly no shortage of bad teachers these days, but that's a far cry from saying that creative thought is no longer nurtured in our schools or in our society. George Bush and his friends may fit into that category, as well as the entire employment roster of Fox News, but I'd hardly go so far as to say that's the norm.
While the unfortunate statistic holds that stupid people are having far more children than intelligent people, so our species is in a sense de-evolving, I don't think we're quite where you think we are yet. We're still for the most part a vibrant, intelligent, creatively driven people and will be for some time.
From: Eve Cartier
All I am trying to say is that I find it interesting that when given the unlimitless, we box ourselves up and slap a pricetag on it.
I find it interesting that you see it that way. I firmly believe we all see whatever we expect to see when we look at the world. Our perceptions have far more to do with our own internal belief systems than whatever may actually be happening externally.
To me, the majority of SL is the kinds of things you'd find on Higbee's parks registry (my place is on it too). I see interesting textures, scultpures, and people every place I go. Admittedly, some more appealing than others, but they're all there, plain as day. To those who actively play the land market, the world probably looks like little mroe than a bunch of for-sale and not-for-sale signs. For some, it's probably just one big shopping mall full of nice things to buy. For others, it's probably what a chat room might look like if chat rooms had actual rooms. For you, it's apparently a place where people haven't lived up to your expectations of what you think they should have done and almost all that exists are people trying every which way to prostitute their talents. If that's truly the way you see it, then I feel sorry for you because you are missing a lot.
For my own part, I would rephrase your last sentence as, "Given the unlimitless, people have done some pretty amazing things. As far as the eye can see there is artwork, countless examples of creative programming, conversation between people from all sorts of different backgrounds, thousands of friendships that might otherwise be impossible, anything and everything one could think of, and yes there is even commerce too. What a world."
I'm sorry that the commerce is all you see, and I'm saddened that you can only think of it as something to complain about. I hope one day you're able to open your eyes a little wider and notice everything else. There sure is a lot to see.