On my first 15minutes into SL I stopped to fix my looks at Cloey Sunchasers house in Da Boom. I had no clue there were sim ratings. I stayed in the area because everyone I met was very nice, helpful and mature. In fact, I noticed that anywhere I went nearly everyone I have ever met in world fit that description of nice, helpful and mature - regardless of sim rating.
I stayed in Mature sims in my first 2 weeks for one reason, i found it first and thought it best to learn my first area before spreading out. I never saw anything vulgar, and never thought the area was a red-light district or that its general architecture was any more or less chaotic or messy than any other sim (save brown, boardman and such places).
Why do you choose to negatively label the mature sims and universalize your own negative experiences as if they should be held as general facts by the rest?
Perhaps in RL you do not agree with such behavior that "mature" connotates but this is Second Life, why bring bitterness or prejudice to what is ultimately the experience you make it.
I know the names of most of the mature sims off the top of my head, but can name far fewer PG sims and I never once thought of this difference being related to some negative stereotype associated with PG sims.
This stereotype is unsettling, and I hardly think my neighbors can ever be defined with those adjectives. Torrid, Marilyn, Cloey, Cricket & Nick, Siobhan, Cristiano, Darzus, Duck, Odalisque, Mistress, Devynn, Nephilaine & Neil, Rebeccah, and the list goes on are all wonderful people who are and have been my neighbors and I can hardly consider them vulgar or messy or chaotic and all of the m have beautiful structures inthe world.
Such a horrible stereotype to stick on the home of your friends. SL is for friends, not for quarrels, petty disagreements and personal prejudices.Ok, im ready for the hate posts and negative ratings in world i guess.
Briana Dawson



