Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Scam???

Keywe Magpie
Registered User
Join date: 6 Oct 2004
Posts: 50
04-15-2005 18:12
Lets say I (use myself to protect the party (for now)) made an object. Announced there will ONLY be x amount of this object sold... sold those and then (in fornt of the original buyers) sell more over and above the (x mount only) claim. Would this be considered scamming? and if so is there any "SL legal right" for me to refund any monies paid through this misleading "only x amount sold) ?
views on this would be interesting to know
thanx.
blaze Spinnaker
1/2 Serious
Join date: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 5,898
04-15-2005 18:36
I believe LL is going to implement Friendster type functionality so that we'll get a better sense of the reputation of individuals.

This is a great idea, as it lets us leverage the wisdom of *crowds*.

Right now, it's very caveat emptor. I think dispute resolution is not necessarily the proper way to fix this.

I believe that friendster type functionality is. Do you trust someone that trusts someone that you're buying from?

That's the question that really needs to be answered.
_____________________
Taken from The last paragraph on pg. 16 of Cory Ondrejka's paper "Changing Realities: User Creation, Communication, and Innovation in Digital Worlds :

"User-created content takes the idea of leveraging player opinions a step further by allowing them to effectively prototype new ideas and features. Developers can then measure which new concepts most improve the products and incorporate them into the game in future patches."
Jillian Callahan
Rotary-winged Neko Girl
Join date: 24 Jun 2004
Posts: 3,766
04-15-2005 18:49
Scarcity of the limited edition is what makes it worth more. If it's advertised as beig limited, that becomes part of the reason to buy it. If it turns out this is not a limited edition, then the item was presented as having more value than it actually posessed.

I *think* that's outright fraud (I'm no laywer.) I am totally certain it's a scummy thing to do.
_____________________
Reitsuki Kojima
Witchhunter
Join date: 27 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,328
04-15-2005 18:55
It's a scam, yes.

Is there any legal recourse by way of linden labs? No.
_____________________
I am myself indifferent honest; but yet I could accuse me of such things that it were better my mother had not borne me: I am very proud, revengeful, ambitious, with more offenses at my beck than I have thoughts to put them in, imagination to give them shape, or time to act them in. What should such fellows as I do crawling between earth and heaven? We are arrant knaves, all; believe none of us.
Kasandra Morgan
Self-Declared Goddess
Join date: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 639
04-15-2005 19:03
Yes that is a scam. No there are no rules against it.
_____________________
SL Exchange | Second Server | In World
Casino Games, Prefab Houses, Clothes and Furniture
blaze Spinnaker
1/2 Serious
Join date: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 5,898
04-15-2005 19:06
I also don't think there should be rules against it.

We need to work the reputation angle a bit more. We need to make reputation more visible.

The fact is, rules really never solve problems.

What solves problem is a culture of respect and truth. Your reputation is a part of that culture. And when your reputation is at risk, you're a lot more likely to do the right thing then the threat of some improbable lawsuit.
_____________________
Taken from The last paragraph on pg. 16 of Cory Ondrejka's paper "Changing Realities: User Creation, Communication, and Innovation in Digital Worlds :

"User-created content takes the idea of leveraging player opinions a step further by allowing them to effectively prototype new ideas and features. Developers can then measure which new concepts most improve the products and incorporate them into the game in future patches."
DoteDote Edison
Thinks Too Much
Join date: 6 Jun 2004
Posts: 790
04-15-2005 19:07
You could name the person here, take your slap on the wrist for doing so, and possibly save others from the disappointment you feel about the object. But, before accusing someone of fraud, you should be sure that your information is correct.

If you don't wish to stir up the controverys in the forums, you could just tell everyone you know that the person is running a scam, in your opinion. Other than these options, there isn't much you can do. This happens all the time in the real world. A company sells a limited edition product... they have serial numbers even. Once they've sold out, a minor change is made - no serial number - and the product is resold to the masses at a discount.
James Miller
Village Idiot
Join date: 9 Jan 2003
Posts: 1,500
04-15-2005 19:13
Had you been entered into a contract with the seller, you'd have some sort of "legal" standing in this. Please vote yes on Prop 39. http://secondlife.com/vote/get_feature.php?get_id=39

Addtionally, see: /invalid_link.html

Sorry this happened to you. :(
It's a really gross thing to do to someone.
_____________________
George W. Bush hates America.
Heratiki Turnbull
Juggalo Ninja Master
Join date: 2 Mar 2005
Posts: 81
04-15-2005 20:04
I'm with you on this Keywe... Let's just say the same person did the same thing to us... Limited... Pfffft... Oh well... Another $6000L Down The Drain... I'm hurtin with ya Key...

Lata...
Luna Thereian
DaZeD
Join date: 30 May 2004
Posts: 45
Gez! Yup And Bleh On Scammers
04-15-2005 20:08
yeah its a shame that a few of us did get SCAMMED.. i mean come on you dont advertise something as being LIMITED then after that LIMITED is sold. you go and produce more for anyone that wants it. paid that kind of amount for something thinking your going to be one of the first come first served people to find out later that you were not?
if you want to sale items thats great.. we all are here to make our way in game.. but please for the sake of those that thought you were legit.. at least take them into conceration.. and thats all i have to say about that :p
Keywe Magpie
Registered User
Join date: 6 Oct 2004
Posts: 50
the scam or scammed
04-15-2005 20:11
Well to further my "issue" ta clear up no it wasnt nor never will be me LOL
I will add i do believe the object in question was (at the time) worth the monies paid BUT to be told (and everybody else that bought one) ONLY 50 sold !!! I more feel betrayed, to find out that there was in fact approx 58 and now they are also being placed in a store to be bought!!!! the person knows who she is and I HOPE that true salesmanship AND an attempt to "save face" enters the soul and at least offers those who purchased a LIMITED SUPPLY a refund to compensate the fraud that was involved.....also drop the price for the future "unweary" souls that think they too are buying a limited object.
Nikki Seraph
Registered User
Join date: 6 Jan 2005
Posts: 238
04-15-2005 21:57
I'd just like to point out that naming names is AOK at sluniverse.com and perhaps some public flogging would do a dishonest soul some good. :eek:

In seriousness, while I do believe that everyone is innocent until proven guilty, I also do not think it unreasonable to give friends and whatnot warning about the individual. No, I am not really all that curious - I AM what you would call a cheapskate - and probably wouldn't spend 6k on something no matter how limited it was. I DO think, however, that people deserve to have some kind of ... fair warning when scam artists pull these types of stunts.
_____________________
"The supreme happiness in life is the conviction that we are loved — loved for ourselves, or rather, loved in spite of ourselves." -Victor Hugo

eNVe Designs: Puea | Slootsville
On the Web: SLexchange | SLboutique
Ursula Madison
Chewbacca is my co-pilot
Join date: 31 Jul 2004
Posts: 713
04-16-2005 04:01
From: Nikki Seraph
I AM what you would call a spendthrift - or cheapskate, pick one - and probably wouldn't spend 6k on something no matter how limited it was.

Actually, Nikki, spendthrift and cheapskate are opposites.

Its not cool for a person to claim something is a limited edition, then turn around and "unlimit" it to get more money. It is as misleading as claiming an item has a certain scripted function when in reality it does not, and anyone buying one of the "limited" edition items are due a refund.
_____________________
"Huh... did everything just taste purple for a second?" -- Philip J. Fry
Issues Ambassador
Ambassador of Issues.....
Join date: 6 Apr 2005
Posts: 90
04-16-2005 07:02
Seen this in other games.

Mostly in other games I ask about the seller and find out about their reputation *before* buying anything called "limited" because of this problem.

Maybe a script that the seller enters how many items are to be sold as 'limited' that stops them from selling the items after the limit is hit. After that the item is locked... stopping even the creator with permissions that are deemed as 'limited' meaning: no sell, no copy, no transfer.

Duplicating the item and selling it as something else (when it's not) could go against the rules?

Just a thought. It has flaws. That's why it's called a "theory." ;)
Buster Peel
Spat the dummy.
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,242
04-16-2005 07:41
This is what the rating system is for.

Before you believe somebody about something like that, peek at their profile and see what their ratings are. Do they have a lot of plusses and few negs? Have they been in the game a long time? Ok, then you can probably believe them.

If they break a promise, neg rate them. Of course, that doesn't undo the wrong, but it does make it harder for rip-off artists.

You have to take everything with a grain of salt anyway -- SL is nearly unregulated, so shit happens.

Buster