Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
Spybot / Satellite poll |
|
How do you feel about the Spybots / SatellitesI am against them because they violate property rights
21 (20.0%)
I am against land barons using this technique
6 (5.7%)
I am against them because I think they create lag
17 (16.2%)
I am against them because the technique might be misused in the future
14 (13.3%)
I am against them because I think that countermeasures might create lag
14 (13.3%)
The arguments against them are overblown
8 (7.6%)
I think they should be allowed
3 (2.9%)
What spybots?
4 (3.8%)
I like cheese
18 (17.1%)
Total votes: 105
|
|
|
Buster Peel
Spat the dummy.
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,242
|
03-15-2005 10:40
What is your opinion about the recent satellite / spybot controversy. Choose all that apply. Poll is *NOT* anonymous -- everyone can see your choices.
|
|
Adam Zaius
Deus
Join date: 9 Jan 2004
Posts: 1,483
|
03-15-2005 10:45
There are legitimate uses for rovers. Now, something that spies on someone would be against the TOS already.
-Adam _____________________
|
|
Buster Peel
Spat the dummy.
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,242
|
03-15-2005 10:51
The results are in. Pandastrong fairplay does NOT like cheese.
|
|
Aimee Weber
The one on the right
Join date: 30 Jan 2004
Posts: 4,286
|
03-15-2005 10:54
Cheese it is.
Hank Ramos has a thread that hits closer to the mark. It's not a question of scanning or what is being scanned. It's a question of objects defeating a land owners attempts to prevent/remove them. _____________________
|
|
Buster Peel
Spat the dummy.
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,242
|
03-15-2005 10:59
There are legitimate uses for rovers. To clarify, this is about the objects discussed here: /108/39/38280/1.html Some people don't have a problem with "Rovers" that don't try to elude detection or self replicate. (Although people who have "property rights" concerns probably won't like "rovers" either) |
|
Buster Peel
Spat the dummy.
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,242
|
03-15-2005 11:03
Hank Ramos has a thread that hits closer to the mark. It's not a question of scanning or what is being scanned. It's a question of objects defeating a land owners attempts to prevent/remove them. I think people who are concerned about that should select the "property rights" selection, that's kind of what it is meant to include. (I wish I had included that specifically as one of the choices, too late now!) |
|
Morlee Moreau
Golden Apple Corps
Join date: 21 Nov 2004
Posts: 33
|
03-15-2005 11:07
To clarify, this is about the objects discussed here: /108/39/38280/1.html Some people don't have a problem with "Rovers" that don't try to elude detection or self replicate. (Although people who have "property rights" concerns probably won't like "rovers" either) I guess im one of those that fall on the property rights angle of it. If by rover, you mean on object that flys around from sim to sim, gathering information, I wouldnt have an issue with one of these passing over my land from time to time. But that is a completely different thing than the objects that are being constantly sent to my land, one after another 24/7. Always there, and no way for me to say otherwise. |
|
Oz Spade
ReadsNoPostLongerThanHand
Join date: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 2,708
|
03-15-2005 11:24
Cheeze For Teh Win!
_____________________
"Don't anticipate outcome," the man said. "Await the unfolding of events. Remain in the moment." - Konrad
|
|
Marilyn Murphy
Obeys Her Toaster
Join date: 23 Jul 2003
Posts: 361
|
03-15-2005 11:50
wondering where i can vote against pointless polls.
so sayeth: marilyn _____________________
>>Players issue 12 is now out and for sale<<
|
|
pandastrong Fairplay
all bout the BANG POW NOW
Join date: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 2,920
|
03-15-2005 11:51
Cheeze For Teh Win! I am sick of cheese. Cheese uses my sim's resources without my permission, and it gets all melty when I try to neg-rate it.  _____________________
"Honestly, you are a gem -- fun, creative, and possessing strong social convictions. I think LL should be paying you to be in their game."
~ Ulrika Zugzwang on the iconography of pandastrong in the media "That's no good. Someone is going to take your place as SL's cutest boy while you're offline." ~ Ingrid Ingersoll on the topic of LL refusing to pay pandastrong for being in their game. |
|
Oz Spade
ReadsNoPostLongerThanHand
Join date: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 2,708
|
03-15-2005 11:52
You like Pie?
_____________________
"Don't anticipate outcome," the man said. "Await the unfolding of events. Remain in the moment." - Konrad
|
|
Alex Lumiere
Registered User
Join date: 1 Jun 2004
Posts: 228
|
03-15-2005 11:54
who moved my cheese?
|
|
pandastrong Fairplay
all bout the BANG POW NOW
Join date: 16 Aug 2004
Posts: 2,920
|
03-15-2005 11:54
You like Pie? Pie is only good with an escort and a side order of sex balls. _____________________
"Honestly, you are a gem -- fun, creative, and possessing strong social convictions. I think LL should be paying you to be in their game."
~ Ulrika Zugzwang on the iconography of pandastrong in the media "That's no good. Someone is going to take your place as SL's cutest boy while you're offline." ~ Ingrid Ingersoll on the topic of LL refusing to pay pandastrong for being in their game. |