Something that repeatedly strikes me as someone who studies language and communication for a living is the use of these three terms - especially in online gaming communities - newbie, oldbie and Beta tester/member.
Newbie can easily be viewed and used as a perjorative, an insult if you will. This perception can be solely on then part of the speaker, on the part of the message receiver, or on the part of both conversational participants.
Oldbie, on the otherhand, is rarely used in a perjorative sense – except in left-handed compliments – it seems. Their “claim to fame” is often based solely on longevity rather than on actual FAQ knowledge or tangible contribution to or participation in a/the community. Yet all three seem to be appropriate reasons to refer to some people as oldbies and not others.
Beta testers seem to be exalted oldbies, viewed as the repositories of communal history, trivia, FAQ knowledge, etc. which theoretically have defined the community as a newbie finds it when first logging into an online game, whether here or elsewhere. Rarely are Beta testers those who have merely survived the passage of time. Most are viewed as having actually contributed something of substance (in any number of arenas or perspectives) to the community or product that oldbies and newbies alike see. Newbies rarely distinguish between Beta testers and olbies for a few reason – primarily because it seems to be a norm not to run around claiming having been a Beta tester within a community. Most knowledge of who actually was a Beta tester seems to come from oldbies rather than from the Beta testers themselves in routine conversation.
Yet, there seems to be a vacuum between newbie and oldbie… no catchall term for someone who is recognizably no longer a newbie yet is not considered by others as an oldbie…. Or is there and I am overlooking it?
So, the point of this little ramble are the following questions.
Does the use of these three terms fit the descriptions I have sketched above? If not, please clarify for me your understanding of the terms.
Is the term newbie more often used as a chronological descriptor or as a perjorative – even in the slightest – when discussed by anyone who no longer considers themselves a newbie?
When discussing newbies and the strange things they do, doesn’t that labeling actually create and/or perpetuate an us/them communal border – that is, what does it take for a newbie to be seen by non-newbies as no longer a newbie? Since a newbie cannot prevent anyone else from referring to himself as such, what criteria are people using to make the decision to elevate this av/person from newbie to non-newbie status?

.