(I suddenly realized that this thread needs a poll, and that's why the last thread didn't even draw trolls.)
I know that the bible is some kind of poesy, so to tackle this matter, avoiding all heresy, we must with a delicate foot tread around the conundrums and doldrums which in forums abound. So post all your best forms of argumentation and spare me your non-rhyming substantiations!
________________________
The hour of Jeska draws near, it is clear, and at the close of the thread will a victor appear?
Who will stand tallest, above all the rest?
Whose rhythmic waxings will prove truest and best?
Above them all, who will appear?
Some will use science while others use seers,
some will lend laughter while others shed tears...
But I have a feeling, let all of you hear,
That all the good points will fall on deaf ears.
________________________
Going back to the previous old chap's assertion that statistics are God and men are all urchins, I'd like to say "if it's unlikely for abiogenesis, then it's equal or more for the acts inside Genesis." -Just as it's statistically near infinitely nill that I'd spout out the phrase "rocket cockatoo shill," but I did, and as you can see, statistics prove nothing of causality (or so it is taught in psychology AP).