Scott Hifeng
Anywhere But Here
Join date: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 112
|
04-16-2008 14:29
Hi, All –
I’m getting a new pc and hope to get comments on this configuration. I’ve been reading the other recent threads on this topic, which have helped a lot. My goal is to optimize SL -- I don’t do anything else that needs a lot of muscle.
I would also appreciate advice as to whether the upgrades listed are worth the money in terms of increased SL performance. (The $1K would hurt, but I could do it if it will make a *big* difference.)
Many thanks!
===========
XPS 630 Intel® Core™2 Q6600 Quad-Core (8MB L2 cache,2.40GHz,1066FSB) Operating System XP Professional Memory 4GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 800MHz - 4 DIMMs Video Card nVidia® GeForce® 8800 GTX 768MB Hard Drive 500GB - 7200RPM, SATA 3.0Gb/s, 16MB Cache Power Supply 750 watts
Processor Upgrades Intel® Core™2 E8500 (6MB,3.16 GHz, 1333FSB), add $150 Intel® Core™2 Extreme QX6850 (8MB,3.0GHz, 1333FSB), add $1,000
Memory Upgrades 2GB Corsair Dominator DDR2 SDRAM 800MHz-2 DIMMs, add $220) 4GB Corsair Dominator DDR2 SDRAM 800MHz -4 DIMMs, add $420)
|
Peggy Paperdoll
A Brat
Join date: 15 Apr 2006
Posts: 4,383
|
04-16-2008 15:44
I have a Lenovo with the same CPU. I have 3 gigs of the same RAM you are getting. NVidia 8600GT (256 on board) and Windows Vista. I run SL superblly so I would say you should also............without upgrading. If you XP pro is 32 bit then 1 gig of that RAM will be unregognized by XP. But I wouldn't toss it.........you never know you might need it some day.  Save your money for the upgrades. What you are getting without them is more than adequate for SL.
|
Scott Hifeng
Anywhere But Here
Join date: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 112
|
04-16-2008 16:50
That's what I was thinking but needed confirmation. Thanks.
|
Nika Talaj
now you see her ...
Join date: 2 Jan 2007
Posts: 5,449
|
04-16-2008 18:04
Hi Scott. If you intend to do any sort of demanding thing WHILE you use SL, or habitually use more than one instance of SL at a time, the quad-core will help considerably. But SL on its own will not run appreciably faster in a quad-core environment than on a dual-core. The application is not structured to take advantage of multiprocessing - most games aren't.
Re: the video card: if you can afford the 8800GTX 768 comfortably, then go for it. But many of us on the forums went for the much more economical 8800GT (mine is a 512), and SL seems to run great. That said, the GTX has very impressive specs that I'm sure will come in handy as SL continues to evolve. .
|
Distilled1 Rush
written in the Pixles
Join date: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 504
|
04-16-2008 18:34
I prefer the xps 7000 but ? I havent looked at the one your looking at.
I run in Ultra all the bling at 128k draw and everything maxed on the below set up at about 20-35 FPS 80% of the time! was 1600usd a year ago
_____________________
Dell XPS-700 (this is a fantastic case!) XP media Intel Core2Duo 2.38ghz Nvida 9800GTX+ 512mg 4 G RAM Dell XPS 1530 Red Core 2 duo VISTA and I like it! Nvidia 8600m 512 6 G RAM Compaq amd 3200 XP home POS! Nvidia FX 5200 2 G RAMM White Box XP pro P 4 Nvidia Shared 128k some odd old PCI card 1 G RAM *(STILL RUNS THE 1.21 CLIENT AND LATEST RC! )
|