
These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
CPU/GPU Mystery |
|
Jeff Auerbauch
Registered User
Join date: 16 Apr 2008
Posts: 2
|
01-29-2009 22:12
i've been on SL for a couple of years, everything runs fine other than a few momentary glitches (frames freeze for a few seconds and rezzing takes time). I run an Athlon 2.4 Gig CPU and have 2 gigs of RAM, and windows task manager shows the CPU running at 99% load, anytime I run SL. Not a big deal, everything smooths out after a few seconds, but that meter bounces up and down from maybe 80 back up to 99%. I bought an Nvidia G-8800 graphics card with 750 Megs of onboard video memory, thinking this would take some of the load off the CPU. Everything runs great, rezzing is faster than ever, no more freeze frames, but the CPU never dropped in load percentage. I've played with all my inworld client setting, even messed with the "my internet connection" speeds to see if it was playing catch-up with packet loss or something... not really an "issue", but can anyone tell me why a CPU rated at twice the speed of the SL/Linden recommended speed is still shouldering so much of the load? Thanks in advance for any and all info.
![]() |
SuezanneC Baskerville
Forums Rock!
![]() Join date: 22 Dec 2003
Posts: 14,229
|
01-29-2009 23:20
I think SL tends to use all the CPU time it can.
If you running other applications does it appear to be sharing the processor properly between SL and the other applications? _____________________
-
So long to these forums, the vBulletin forums that used to be at forums.secondlife.com. I will miss them. I can be found on the web by searching for "SuezanneC Baskerville", or go to http://www.google.com/profiles/suezanne - http://lindenlab.tribe.net/ created on 11/19/03. Members: Ben, Catherine, Colin, Cory, Dan, Doug, Jim, Philip, Phoenix, Richard, Robin, and Ryan - |
Chosen Few
Alpha Channel Slave
Join date: 16 Jan 2004
Posts: 7,496
|
01-30-2009 11:07
Perfectly normal behavior. SL will always use all resources available to it.
As Suzanne seemed to be getting at, as long as you've got no problem running other applications at the same time (within reason, of course), everything is fine. _____________________
.
Land now available for rent in Indigo. Low rates. Quiet, low-lag mainland sim with good neighbors. IM me in-world if you're interested. |
Milla Janick
Empress Of The Universe
![]() Join date: 2 Jan 2008
Posts: 3,075
|
01-30-2009 14:16
but can anyone tell me why a CPU rated at twice the speed of the SL/Linden recommended speed is still shouldering so much of the load? The system requirements are too low. _____________________
![]() http://www.avatarsunited.com/avatars/milla-janick All those moments will be lost in time... like tears in rain... |
Peggy Paperdoll
A Brat
Join date: 15 Apr 2006
Posts: 4,383
|
01-30-2009 16:41
It's funny that everyone seems to always say "it's normal". The last time I saw that on a computer I was running was about 3 years ago when I had an old P4 single core processor. Since then I've upgraded my system three times. Each time getting a newer, faster CPU until I have what I presently have (Core 2 Duo Quad E6600). And each upgrade lessened the usage considerably. My CPU usage runs in the neighborhood of 25%...........quite consistantly.
It's "normal" if you are running an older CPU.......abnormal if running a modern, faster CPU. I tend to preferr Intel over AMD........maybe it's is a "normal" thing for AMD's. There is another person in this house that runs SL.........that computer mimicks mine. |
Osgeld Barmy
Registered User
Join date: 22 Mar 2005
Posts: 3,336
|
01-30-2009 19:02
I tend to preferr Intel over AMD........maybe it's is a "normal" thing for AMD's. nope, even my single core x64 stays pretty low 99% of the time its ALLLLL the other crap in the background running, windows stuff, quicktime, that nvidia thingie ect ect ect which stays pretty dormant until something like SL sets everything off at once ... come to think of it my old 1.9 ghz 32 bit athalon xp stayed pretty low too |
Jeff Auerbauch
Registered User
Join date: 16 Apr 2008
Posts: 2
|
addendum
01-30-2009 21:03
hey everybody, thanks for the replies!
![]() ![]() |
Anya Ristow
Vengeance Studio
Join date: 21 Sep 2006
Posts: 1,243
|
01-30-2009 21:52
For those quoting CPU percentages, make sure SL is the active window. When it's not, it offers up more time to other processes. When it's the active window it uses all it can for itself.
If you have a quad-core processor running 25%, SL is probably fully loading one core. On my newer 2-core processor with decent graphics card, SL uses 50% CPU, which is one core fully loaded. If the task manager is the active window, the CPU usage goes to 11% or so. If you're concerned about it, you can tell SL to offer up more CPU time to other programs using the "cooperative" command line argument. http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Client_parameters _____________________
The Vengeance Studio Gadget Store is closed!
![]() |
Distilled1 Rush
written in the Pixles
![]() Join date: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 504
|
02-02-2009 21:31
MY older single cores run 100% my dual runs 50% and my Quad 25%
SL will and does use 100% if it can. _____________________
Dell XPS-700 (this is a fantastic case!)
XP media Intel Core2Duo 2.38ghz Nvida 9800GTX+ 512mg 4 G RAM Dell XPS 1530 Red Core 2 duo VISTA and I like it! Nvidia 8600m 512 6 G RAM Compaq amd 3200 XP home POS! Nvidia FX 5200 2 G RAMM White Box XP pro P 4 Nvidia Shared 128k some odd old PCI card 1 G RAM *(STILL RUNS THE 1.21 CLIENT AND LATEST RC! ) |