These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
Relocating the cache? |
|
Eggy Lippmann
Wiktator
![]() Join date: 1 May 2003
Posts: 7,939
|
10-27-2003 03:17
This feature was suggested by many users and was reported as being considered for v1.1. So, can we move the cache folder to another drive now, and how?
|
Hutch Zapata
Junior Member
Join date: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1
|
05-01-2004 19:11
Was this ever answered? Can we relocate the cache?
Thanks. |
Carnildo Greenacre
Flight Engineer
Join date: 15 Nov 2003
Posts: 1,044
|
05-01-2004 22:14
Unfortunately, no. I've got 34+ GB free on my system, but I'm stuck with a 50MB cache since the drive with the OS only has a little over 200MB free.
(I can't use a 200MB cache because of another bug: the cache will frequently go somewhat over the limit you set.) _____________________
perl -le '$_ = 1; (1 x $_) !~ /^(11+)\1+$/ && print while $_++;'
|
Huns Valen
Don't PM me here.
![]() Join date: 3 May 2003
Posts: 2,749
|
05-01-2004 22:34
LL needs to just let us specify the damn path. I'm so sick of getting bugged about how I'm almost out of space, when the drive the rest of SL lives on has tens of gigs free.
_____________________
|
Phil Metalhead
Game Foundry Leaɗer
![]() Join date: 11 Mar 2003
Posts: 291
|
bump bump bump bump
05-06-2004 06:07
HEAR HEAR!
i created my OS partition as a 4GB partition - more than enough for even the most bloated installs of windows. then SL comes along and ABSOLUTELY INSISTS on putting it's ENTIRE CACHE on the OS partition. presto. instant annoying "disk space warning" errors. never mind the fact that drives E: and F: both have over 4GB free apiece, that would be an ideal location for a large cache area lindens, hear our cries! make it so! |
Colin Linden
Failure of Profile Wit
Join date: 26 Aug 2003
Posts: 104
|
05-06-2004 07:16
I know this has been answered in at least one thread.
Currently the only way to relocate your cache is to relocate your entire Documents and Settings folder. This Misrosoft article describes it for Windows 2000: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;236621&Product=win2000 But, unless you know what you are doing I would not suggest taking this action as a bad registry can ruin your day. Coin |
Arito Cotton
Still Addicted
![]() Join date: 25 Aug 2003
Posts: 131
|
05-06-2004 10:51
I have my SecondLife cache located all by itself on a separate partition - without moving my Documents and Settings folder.
How?! The following method is my way of doing this under Windows XP (Attempt on NT or 2k at your own risk). The probability of this working in ME, 98, 98SE, 95 or 3.11 is almost non-existent. You are about to use NT Junctions (symbolic links if you are UNIX-compatible). Do not continue unless you know what you're doing. Junctions can get messy. Make sure you back up your important data, yadda yadda yadda.
CODE
I've been using this method for at least a few months with no ill side effects. Speed improvement? Not noticeable for me, but it seems like things are more consistent now. And it makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside. More information: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;205524 Edit: Rewrote it to link the entire SecondLife folder, not just the cache folder. My apologies to anyone who already did it, please undo it with the instructions below, then redo it. Edit: To undo all this, go to the command prompt and type "cd C:\Documents and Settings\<your user name>\Application Data\SecondLife\" then "mountvol cache /d". You should have a normal cache directory again. |
Phil Metalhead
Game Foundry Leaɗer
![]() Join date: 11 Mar 2003
Posts: 291
|
05-06-2004 15:21
Originally posted by Colin Linden I know this has been answered in at least one thread. Currently the only way to relocate your cache is to relocate your entire Documents and Settings folder. This Misrosoft article describes it for Windows 2000: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;236621&Product=win2000 But, unless you know what you are doing I would not suggest taking this action as a bad registry can ruin your day. Coin that's an ugly fix, and generally speaking, i like where my documents and settings folder is ![]() is there any hope that we might get this changed in the future (i.e. be able to specify cache location)? i myself can do the symlink fix suggested by Arito Cotton, and probably will. however, this is not a task for the squeamish (many many people are intimidated by the command prompt alone). also, that seems as if it would relocate your cache to the root directory of the partition specified. this can be most undesirable for some people. |
Sinclair Valen
The One who Was
![]() Join date: 1 May 2003
Posts: 360
|
05-06-2004 19:54
Originally posted by Arito Cotton <snip> I've been using this method for at least a few months with no ill side effects. Speed improvement? Not noticeable for me, but it seems like things are more consistent now. And it makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside. Interesting. Straightforward approach that makes sense, assuming you have the partition-management tools and a few spare GB on the ol' hard disk. One question: Do you need to recreate the link after SL upgrade/reinstall or is it preserved correctly? =Sinclair _____________________
* - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - *
SL Fiction:: "HIPPOS: Gnomecrusher's Legacy" In a world of Second Life, Stomp, Maw and Wallow are three young hippos. Seeking to avenge their lost father, they soon discover a threat to all Avatars. (2006-0 ![]() |
Arito Cotton
Still Addicted
![]() Join date: 25 Aug 2003
Posts: 131
|
05-06-2004 20:46
I've had no problems while upgrading SecondLife using this method.
(I did edit the above post to use the main SecondLife data directory instead of just the cache, I think it's better this way.) |
Phil Metalhead
Game Foundry Leaɗer
![]() Join date: 11 Mar 2003
Posts: 291
|
05-07-2004 07:10
*blink*
i know a GUI way to do that.
NOTE: while these steps may be easier to execute than Arito's method, they are NO LESS DANGEROUS. if you don't know what you're doing, and/or feel uncomfortable screwing with the way windows manages storage, DO NOT DO THIS!!! |