These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE
WHY Are Object IM's Limited Now? |
|
Christopher Omega
Oxymoron
Join date: 28 Mar 2003
Posts: 1,828
|
10-28-2003 05:38
With the advent of v1.1, Ive found that stored object IM's are now limited. Alot of my objects IM me while offline, and I need most of the info contained in those IMs. The resending of object IMs sent to you while your offline can lead to some lag, but I propose that we make limiting the number of stored object IMs an option that can be turned off.
_____________________
October 3rd is the Day Against DRM (Digital Restrictions Management), learn more at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm
|
Bosozoku Kato
insurrectionist midget
![]() Join date: 16 Jun 2003
Posts: 452
|
10-28-2003 05:50
We don't need im's we need persistant information storage. You know, like a text file :p
llWriteLine2Notecard()... something like that. then maybe a llSendNotecard2Owner().. (sending a copy of the note in the script task to its owner) for nightly/daily/weekly datamining and such. As well as a ton of other options persistant info will bring. ..I know I know it's all been mentioned before, but I can't help myself! Bos |
Garoad Kuroda
Prophet of Muppetry
![]() Join date: 5 Sep 2003
Posts: 2,989
|
10-29-2003 16:10
We need llWriteLine2Notecard() AND llCreateChocolateChipCookie().
And it better make the soft kind! |