Second Life Forums Archive - a concern with Spring Cleaning

bUTTONpUSHER Jones

professional puddlejumper

Join date: 10 Oct 2002

Posts: 172

04-26-2003 14:14

From: someone

Originally posted by Hunter Linden

When we run the process all land and in-world objects owned by the inactive account revert to “public” allowing new Residents to claim or recycle the old content (and get some Linden Dollars for cleaning up the landscape).

these public object are fully permissive.

can they behave in the same way as objects decaying on public land, and become delete only, not copyable or permissive?

if i give a friend some object which has a propiatory texture/script/whatever with the understanding that he doesn't give it away or sell it, but then he leaves the game, that object is now up for grabs. or make up your own scenario.

can this be changed ASAP, and in the future always lean toward keeping the objects less permissive?

if you agree this is a legit concern, please say so. =]

bp

Dave Zeeman

Master Procrastinator

Join date: 28 Jan 2003

Posts: 1,025

04-26-2003 14:16

seconded (took you long enough to post about it haha)

_____________________

llToggleDaveZeemanIntelligence(FALSE);
Philip Linden: Zeeman, strip off the suit!
Dave Zeeman - Keeping Lindens on their toes since v0.3.2!

ramon Kothari

FIC

Join date: 9 Dec 2002

Posts: 249

04-27-2003 05:35

third.......

i guess if this was a real democracy we would have enough to put it up for a vote

(just so you all know i am just joking around )

Nada Epoch

The Librarian

Join date: 4 Nov 2002

Posts: 1,423

04-27-2003 05:55

Fjorded. even though i am almost entirely open-source, i understand the concerns.

_____________________

i've got nothing.

Zanlew Wu

Registered User

Join date: 5 Feb 2003

Posts: 112

04-27-2003 07:54

Fifthed...before I drink it all by myself.

This occured to me last night while I was walking around cleaning up my neighborhood and stumbled upon something. I deleted it since it had a script on it that was not one of the generic ones I've seen floating around for free, but I could not help but wonder if anyone was going to be concerned it was missing or if anyone had copied it already.

_____________________

In theory, practice and theory are the same thing. In practice, they're not.

a concern with Spring Cleaning
bUTTONpUSHER Jones professional puddlejumper Join date: 10 Oct 2002 Posts: 172	04-26-2003 14:14 From: someone Originally posted by Hunter Linden When we run the process all land and in-world objects owned by the inactive account revert to “public” allowing new Residents to claim or recycle the old content (and get some Linden Dollars for cleaning up the landscape). these public object are fully permissive. can they behave in the same way as objects decaying on public land, and become delete only, not copyable or permissive? if i give a friend some object which has a propiatory texture/script/whatever with the understanding that he doesn't give it away or sell it, but then he leaves the game, that object is now up for grabs. or make up your own scenario. can this be changed ASAP, and in the future always lean toward keeping the objects less permissive? if you agree this is a legit concern, please say so. =] bp
Dave Zeeman Master Procrastinator Join date: 28 Jan 2003 Posts: 1,025	04-26-2003 14:16 seconded (took you long enough to post about it haha) _____________________ llToggleDaveZeemanIntelligence(FALSE); Philip Linden: Zeeman, strip off the suit! Dave Zeeman - Keeping Lindens on their toes since v0.3.2!
ramon Kothari FIC Join date: 9 Dec 2002 Posts: 249	04-27-2003 05:35 third....... i guess if this was a real democracy we would have enough to put it up for a vote (just so you all know i am just joking around )
Nada Epoch The Librarian Join date: 4 Nov 2002 Posts: 1,423	04-27-2003 05:55 Fjorded. even though i am almost entirely open-source, i understand the concerns. _____________________ i've got nothing.
Zanlew Wu Registered User Join date: 5 Feb 2003 Posts: 112	04-27-2003 07:54 Fifthed...before I drink it all by myself. This occured to me last night while I was walking around cleaning up my neighborhood and stumbled upon something. I deleted it since it had a script on it that was not one of the generic ones I've seen floating around for free, but I could not help but wonder if anyone was going to be concerned it was missing or if anyone had copied it already. _____________________ In theory, practice and theory are the same thing. In practice, they're not.

Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

a concern with Spring Cleaning