|
Sensual Casanova
Spoiled Brat
Join date: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 4,807
|
10-27-2005 20:31
Would you buy more SL content if you could buy it ....
|
|
Eboni Khan
Misanthrope
Join date: 17 Mar 2004
Posts: 2,133
|
10-27-2005 20:49
Direct bill to CC would have been a nice option...
|
|
Sensual Casanova
Spoiled Brat
Join date: 28 Feb 2004
Posts: 4,807
|
10-27-2005 21:20
From: Eboni Khan Direct bill to CC would have been a nice option... Oops didnt think of that one =/ |
|
Hiro Pendragon
bye bye f0rums!
Join date: 22 Jan 2004
Posts: 5,905
|
10-27-2005 21:23
From: Eboni Khan Direct bill to CC would have been a nice option... Isn't that the whole point of Lindex?
_____________________
Hiro Pendragon
------------------
http://www.involve3d.com - Involve - Metaverse / Emerging Media Studio
Visit my SL blog: http://secondtense.blogspot.com
|
|
Kage Seraph
I Dig Giant Mecha
Join date: 3 Nov 2004
Posts: 513
|
10-28-2005 04:33
I don't think direct to CC would be a viable option, based on the CC transaction fees. Considering that probably a plurality of object purchases are for $L1000 or less, it would mean that the credit card transaction fees would be a substantial portion of the RL cost of the object. That would eat into LL's cut in a big way.
Doing it via Lindex gives users incentive to buy larger blocks of cash, lowering the CC fee to $L transacted ratio.
What was the question again? =D
|
|
blaze Spinnaker
1/2 Serious
Join date: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 5,898
|
10-28-2005 07:37
cc / paypal just means lots of chargebacks.
I'd prefer to use L$, thank you.
|
|
Aurael Neurocam
Will script for food
Join date: 25 Oct 2005
Posts: 267
|
10-28-2005 11:10
YOu need another check box: I woudn't buy more content now matter how you billed it.
I try to create most of what I need. I simply don't have extra real-world $$ to throw at SL, and the stipend I do get goes toward texture uploads and such.
|
