Welcome to the Second Life Forums Archive

These forums are CLOSED. Please visit the new forums HERE

Land swoopers days numbered?

Fade Languish
I just build stuff...
Join date: 20 Oct 2005
Posts: 1,760
08-17-2006 04:36
http://blog.secondlife.com/2006/08/16/as-days-go-by/

Torley Linden:

"YES SOMETHING IS BEING DONE ABOUT LAND SWOOPING! Look for a completely overhauled “set land for sale” process, currently being worked on. Still easy-to-use but will deter unhappy accidents. Many Lindens have been giving their input directly based on the many sad stories we’ve heard. Consider this a distilled achievable!"

Finally! Hopefully it will be an effective solution.

Sucked in land swoopers :p
_____________________
Richie Waves
Predictable
Join date: 29 Jun 2005
Posts: 1,424
08-17-2006 04:42
yes!!

also.. we should shoot all the land swoopers too!! Vote prop 1689!! Have all land swoopers rounded up in RL and shot. :D
_____________________
no u!
Aodhan McDunnough
Gearhead
Join date: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 1,518
08-17-2006 04:47
*Uploads water condensation texture

*Overlays new texture on green bottle

*scripts champagne-spray particle effect

*activates script

Yeah!
_____________________
Aodhan's Forge shop at slurl.com/secondlife/Rieul/95/213/107
Cannae Brentano
NeoTermite
Join date: 21 Apr 2006
Posts: 368
08-17-2006 04:54
From: Fade Languish
http://blog.secondlife.com/2006/08/16/as-days-go-by/

Torley Linden:

"YES SOMETHING IS BEING DONE ABOUT LAND SWOOPING! Look for a completely overhauled “set land for sale” process, currently being worked on. Still easy-to-use but will deter unhappy accidents. Many Lindens have been giving their input directly based on the many sad stories we’ve heard. Consider this a distilled achievable!"

Finally! Hopefully it will be an effective solution.

Sucked in land swoopers :p



I wonder how many of these stories were heard in the forums as opposed to other means of communication? Not trying to start an argument here, but this was something discussed quite often in the forums and I'm curious if LL would have realized the scope of the problem, and if other members would have come forward, but for the forums.
Fade Languish
I just build stuff...
Join date: 20 Oct 2005
Posts: 1,760
08-17-2006 04:58
From: Cannae Brentano
I wonder how many of these stories were heard in the forums as opposed to other means of communication? Not trying to start an argument here, but this was something discussed quite often in the forums and I'm curious if LL would have realized the scope of the problem, and if other members would have come forward, but for the forums.


No argument from me. It's a totally valid question.
_____________________
Clubside Granville
Registered Bonehead
Join date: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 478
08-17-2006 04:58
I submitted a detailed solution not too long ago:

/108/3e/114732/1.html#post1097895

I had planned on making the screen mock-ups as part of my SLCC presentation, so maybe I'll include those at my Second Life Home Pagesite.
_____________________
Second Life Home Page Forums - slhomepage.com

Second Life Handbook - slhandbook.com

Second Life Mainland - slmainland.com
Coyote Momiji
Pintsized Plutonium
Join date: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 715
08-17-2006 05:00
From: Cannae Brentano
I wonder how many of these stories were heard in the forums as opposed to other means of communication? Not trying to start an argument here, but this was something discussed quite often in the forums and I'm curious if LL would have realized the scope of the problem, and if other members would have come forward, but for the forums.


Probably not a lot, I imagine.
Alazarin Mondrian
Teh Trippy Hippie Dragon
Join date: 4 Apr 2005
Posts: 1,549
08-17-2006 05:02
That's a very good point, Cannae. Unfortunately t3h f0rumz are d00med :(
_____________________
My stuff on Meta-Life: http://tinyurl.com/ykq7nzt
http://www.myspace.com/alazarinmobius
http://slurl.com/secondlife/Crescent/72/98/116
Aodhan McDunnough
Gearhead
Join date: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 1,518
08-17-2006 05:04
From: Fade Languish
No argument from me. It's a totally valid question.


Not just a valid question, a most interesting one also. Further to this question, if it turns out that the primary motivation for the change and solution were derived from the forums I'd like to know how they will replace this information conduit when they close the forum.
_____________________
Aodhan's Forge shop at slurl.com/secondlife/Rieul/95/213/107
Coyote Momiji
Pintsized Plutonium
Join date: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 715
08-17-2006 05:05
From: Aodhan McDunnough
Not just a valid question, a most interesting one also. Further to this question, if it turns out that the primary motivation for the change and solution were derived from the forums I'd like to know how they will replace this information conduit when they close the forum.


Why, [email]abuse@lindenlabs.com[/email], of course.

...F*ck, I can't even laugh at it.
Lewis Nerd
Nerd by name and nature!
Join date: 9 Oct 2005
Posts: 3,431
08-17-2006 05:08
A simple solution, surely, would be to not publicly list plots that are set for L$0 or L$1 in the first place?

Add to that a timed refresh - even if only 5 minutes - so that things don't appear instantly ... and most people's problems are solved.

Nothing, sadly, will stop the unethical types that are the root cause of land swooping - but at least it slows them down.

Lewis
_____________________
Second Life Stratics - your new premier resource for all things Second Life. Free to join, sign up today!

Pocket Protector Projects - Rosieri 90,234,84 - building and landscaping services
Coyote Momiji
Pintsized Plutonium
Join date: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 715
08-17-2006 05:11
I liked the idea of a limbo/grace period (can't remember who posted it, sorry). You sell the land, the money and the land stays in limbo for a short period of time (say an hour). In that time you can break off the transaction if you change your mind.
Fade Languish
I just build stuff...
Join date: 20 Oct 2005
Posts: 1,760
08-17-2006 05:14
From: Aodhan McDunnough
Not just a valid question, a most interesting one also. Further to this question, if it turns out that the primary motivation for the change and solution were derived from the forums I'd like to know how they will replace this information conduit when they close the forum.


This is the million dollar question as far as I'm concerned. They say they want more 'signal', less 'noise'. The forums definitely were able to convey the magnitude of problems and concerns. They will have to stay pretty damn attuned to that signal now, and I'm not sure that's entirely possible via the blog comments. They better listen real close.
_____________________
Aodhan McDunnough
Gearhead
Join date: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 1,518
08-17-2006 05:53
From: Lewis Nerd
A simple solution, surely, would be to not publicly list plots that are set for L$0 or L$1 in the first place?

Add to that a timed refresh - even if only 5 minutes - so that things don't appear instantly ... and most people's problems are solved.

Nothing, sadly, will stop the unethical types that are the root cause of land swooping - but at least it slows them down.

Lewis


There is something that would stop swoopers dead in their tracks, I proposed it in the Answers forum as a 1-way idea feed, and it's a very simple client-side change. All it does is set the default buyer to (nobody) and will refuse to complete the sell setup until a buyer is specified. To be able to sell to (anybody) you have to type ";(anybody)."
_____________________
Aodhan's Forge shop at slurl.com/secondlife/Rieul/95/213/107
Cherokee Darling
Registered User
Join date: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 8
Yesssss
08-23-2006 11:23
From: Aodhan McDunnough
There is something that would stop swoopers dead in their tracks, I proposed it in the Answers forum as a 1-way idea feed, and it's a very simple client-side change. All it does is set the default buyer to (nobody) and will refuse to complete the sell setup until a buyer is specified. To be able to sell to (anybody) you have to type ";(anybody)."


Bravo...excellent idea dqam sure it takes hold if the newest changes dont work...certianly this one would Brain is working on fastforward Aodhan...
Corona Lime
Lunatico
Join date: 14 Aug 2006
Posts: 171
08-23-2006 11:24
From: Cannae Brentano
I wonder how many of these stories were heard in the forums as opposed to other means of communication? Not trying to start an argument here, but this was something discussed quite often in the forums and I'm curious if LL would have realized the scope of the problem, and if other members would have come forward, but for the forums.


Do you think Linden will become members of other forums? I should thinik once a clear cut leader emerges, they will monitor the conversations on those forums.
_____________________
RCE Universe - bridging virtual worlds...
Xceptopec Wolfstein
Registered User
Join date: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 153
08-23-2006 11:32
Since I am neither side of the fence here I can get away with saying this

Land Swoopers - sure they are a nuisance, sure they leave pepole out of pocket, however if people do similar in the real world(be it land or anything else), as long as they have not done anything illegal (only illegal, immoral has no grounding in law) then the person that has lost out has no recourse short of a civil lawsuit (or giving the person that allowed them to lose out a damned good shoeing).

Can people who have fallen victim to Land Swoopers honestly say hand on heart that they have not taken advantage of a similar error in real life on anything (but it small and mundane or large scale)? I'm willing to bet some of the people that sry about losing out to Land Swoopers have themselves benefitted from someone elses error either in RL or SL at least once, so let me ask those that are guilty of this, aren't you just being a shade hypocritical to cry about the Land Swoopers that got one over you?
Isaac Bergson
Registered User
Join date: 31 Oct 2005
Posts: 66
Wholey land swooping ending ideas!
08-23-2006 11:35
From: Aodhan McDunnough
There is something that would stop swoopers dead in their tracks, I proposed it in the Answers forum as a 1-way idea feed, and it's a very simple client-side change. All it does is set the default buyer to (nobody) and will refuse to complete the sell setup until a buyer is specified. To be able to sell to (anybody) you have to type ";(anybody)."


Now this is an idea to end it all! If they even let us set it for sale to NOBODY and have it listed in the FIND! Then the buyer would have to IM the seller and have them set it to THEM! Now that I'd love to see so much more then ANYBODY! There would be no doubt then that the person who bought the land got it at a price they were susposed to get it for! This is a totally amazing idea. And I'd go for that idea 100%!

Way to go on that one Aodhan! I really like this one!

Isaac
Fade Languish
I just build stuff...
Join date: 20 Oct 2005
Posts: 1,760
08-23-2006 11:49
They fixed the joining land problem too! From the release notes:

* Parcel joins and subdivides uncheck the For Sale box
_____________________