Would it be against TOS to...
|
|
Kujila Maltz
lol
Join date: 6 Aug 2005
Posts: 444
|
10-21-2005 17:08
make an object that asks for a user's permission to take money, then it sends me all their money. =D
|
|
Enabran Templar
Capitalist Pig
Join date: 26 Aug 2004
Posts: 4,506
|
10-21-2005 17:19
From: someone Disturbing the Peace
Every Resident has a right to live their Second Life. Disrupting scheduled events, repeated transmission of undesired advertising content, the use of repetitive sounds, following or self-spawning items, or other objects that intentionally slow server performance or inhibit another Resident's ability to enjoy Second Life are examples of Disturbing the Peace. Policies and Policing Not acceptable according to community standards. I think having all of your L$ stolen would inhibit your enjoyment of SL quite a bit. It's also an obviously shitty thing to do. Thanks for wasting our time with this thread!
_____________________
From: Hiro Pendragon Furthermore, as Second Life goes to the Metaverse, and this becomes an open platform, Linden Lab risks lawsuit in court and [attachment culling] will, I repeat WILL be reverse in court.
|
|
Kujila Maltz
lol
Join date: 6 Aug 2005
Posts: 444
|
10-21-2005 17:23
From: Enabran Templar Not acceptable according to community standards. I think having all of your L$ stolen would inhibit your enjoyment of SL quite a bit. It's also an obviously shitty thing to do. Thanks for wasting our time with this thread! Thanks |
|
Buster Peel
Spat the dummy.
Join date: 7 Feb 2005
Posts: 1,242
|
10-21-2005 19:58
From: Kujila Maltz make an object that asks for a user's permission to take money, then it sends me all their money. =D If you can do that you are a better scripter than me! |
|
Martin Magpie
Catherine Cotton
Join date: 13 Nov 2004
Posts: 1,826
|
10-21-2005 20:50
rofl
|
|
Jesrad Seraph
Nonsense
Join date: 11 Dec 2004
Posts: 1,463
|
10-22-2005 01:06
Oh, yes, I think they mean to inform you that only an object owned by a person can send out this person's money. So, you can't even make one such thing. And it's against the ToS.
_____________________
Either Man can enjoy universal freedom, or Man cannot. If it is possible then everyone can act freely if they don't stop anyone else from doing same. If it is not possible, then conflict will arise anyway so punch those that try to stop you. In conclusion the only strategy that wins in all cases is that of doing what you want against all adversity, as long as you respect that right in others.
|
|
Jeffrey Gomez
Cubed™
Join date: 11 Jun 2004
Posts: 3,522
|
10-22-2005 02:44
Actually, it's perfectly legal and happily considered an "ethical" practice in Second Life. They're called Gambling Scripts. 
_____________________
---
|
|
blaze Spinnaker
1/2 Serious
Join date: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 5,898
|
10-22-2005 02:51
From: someone
(v) take any actions or upload, post, e-mail or otherwise transmit Content that contains any viruses, Trojan horses, worms, time bombs, cancelbots or other computer programming routines that are intended to damage, detrimentally interfere with, surreptitiously intercept or expropriate any system, data or personal information; (vi) take any action or upload, post, email or otherwise transmit any Content that would violate any right or duty under any law or under contractual or fiduciary relationships (such as inside information, proprietary and confidential information learned or disclosed as part of employment relationships or under nondisclosure agreements);
And yes, ignore the troll. |
|
blaze Spinnaker
1/2 Serious
Join date: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 5,898
|
10-22-2005 02:52
From: Jesrad Seraph Oh, yes, I think they mean to inform you that only an object owned by a person can send out this person's money. So, you can't even make one such thing. And it's against the ToS. Well, giving objects to people as trojans is fairly straightforward. You could write one probably in about 20 lines of code. Do a search on "RedWings" but think smarter. |
