|
Dillon Morenz
Registered User
Join date: 21 May 2006
Posts: 85
|
06-09-2006 04:55
-
|
|
Margaret Mfume
I.C.
Join date: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 2,492
|
06-09-2006 07:52
You use the prims allocated elsewhere on your parcel and leave a visual buffer between you and your neighbor. A plant sounds lovely. You don't have to build up to the very edge of your property lines and it's generally considered to be more aesthetically pleasing if you don't. You can apply your prim allocation to land owned anywhere within a sim whether it's connected or not.
_____________________
hush 
|
|
Dillon Morenz
Registered User
Join date: 21 May 2006
Posts: 85
|
06-09-2006 11:12
From: Margaret Mfume You use the prims allocated elsewhere on your parcel and leave a visual buffer between you and your neighbor. A plant sounds lovely. You don't have to build up to the very edge of your property lines and it's generally considered to be more aesthetically pleasing if you don't. You can apply your prim allocation to land owned anywhere within a sim whether it's connected or not. I realise that Margaret. But leaving a 'visual buffer' is hardly an issue here because I'm talking about land surrounded by protected land. You get a 'visual buffer' by default.  I just wonder -- as somebody who has bought and built (with neighbourly consideration) on two pieces of land already -- why dog legs most often occur when land is surrounded by protected land. And what is the point of owning 12 square metres of land that appears to be on somebody else's property anyway? Particularly considering the example I provided shows a neighbour WITHOUT regard for a visual buffer at all. Surely you don't think he deserves a free pot plant?  -- Dillon |
|
Margaret Mfume
I.C.
Join date: 30 Dec 2004
Posts: 2,492
|
06-09-2006 11:52
From: Dillon Morenz I realise that Margaret. But leaving a 'visual buffer' is hardly an issue here because I'm talking about land surrounded by protected land. You get a 'visual buffer' by default. I just wonder -- as somebody who has bought and built (with neighbourly consideration) on two pieces of land already -- why dog legs most often occur when land is surrounded by protected land. And what is the point of owning 12 square metres of land that appears to be on somebody else's property anyway? Particularly considering the example I provided shows a neighbour WITHOUT regard for a visual buffer at all. Surely you don't think he deserves a free pot plant? -- Dillon Dude, if there's free pot going around, pass it over to me.
_____________________
hush
|
|
Dillon Morenz
Registered User
Join date: 21 May 2006
Posts: 85
|
06-10-2006 02:47
From: Margaret Mfume Dude, if there's free pot going around, pass it over to me. LMAO! -- Dillon |